• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从心理到躯体?《美国精神病学杂志》中反社会人格障碍观点的转变

From psyche to soma? Changing accounts of antisocial personality disorders in the American Journal of Psychiatry.

作者信息

Pickersgill Martyn

机构信息

Public Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.

出版信息

Hist Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;21(83 Pt 3):294-311. doi: 10.1177/0957154X09102800.

DOI:10.1177/0957154X09102800
PMID:21879688
Abstract

The history of psychiatry is often portrayed through the metaphor of a pendulum, the profession swinging back and forth between a concern with psyche and soma. Recent work critiquing the pendulum metaphor, however, suggests that it does not account for the complexity of psychiatry. This article explores the metaphor through an analysis of the changing aetiological accounts of personality disorders associated with antisocial behaviour advanced in the American Journal of Psychiatry from 1950 onwards. It is argued that the social, scientific and economic factors which help shape overarching professional trends in psychiatry only partly structure personality disorder discourse. If the pendulum swings, therefore, not all psychiatrists move with it.

摘要

精神病学的历史常被用钟摆的隐喻来描绘,该专业在关注心理与躯体之间来回摆动。然而,近期对钟摆隐喻提出批评的研究表明,它无法解释精神病学的复杂性。本文通过分析1950年以来《美国精神病学杂志》中提出的与反社会行为相关的人格障碍病因解释的变化,来探讨这一隐喻。有人认为,有助于塑造精神病学总体专业趋势的社会、科学和经济因素只是部分地构建了人格障碍的话语体系。因此,如果钟摆摆动,并非所有精神病医生都会随之而动。

相似文献

1
From psyche to soma? Changing accounts of antisocial personality disorders in the American Journal of Psychiatry.从心理到躯体?《美国精神病学杂志》中反社会人格障碍观点的转变
Hist Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;21(83 Pt 3):294-311. doi: 10.1177/0957154X09102800.
2
Beyond the metaphor of the pendulum: electroconvulsive therapy, psychoanalysis, and the styles of American psychiatry.超越钟摆隐喻:电休克疗法、精神分析与美国精神病学的风格
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2006 Jan;61(1):1-25. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrj001. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
3
[From "psychopathy" to "personality disorder"--conceptual history of a problematic field within psychiatry].[从“精神变态”到“人格障碍”——精神病学中一个问题领域的概念史]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2015 Nov 11;104(23):1271-7. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002179.
4
Kraepelin's psychiatry in the pragmatic age.实用主义时代的克雷佩林精神病学。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2022 Jan 27;44(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00480-w.
5
[The psychopath].[精神变态者]
Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1967;67(11):1717-9.
6
[Korsakoff's conception on psychopathic constitution and predisposition to mental disorders].
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2013;113(11):64-73.
7
[Psychopathic personalities (before and after Kurt Schneider)].[精神病态人格(在库尔特·施耐德之前和之后)]
J Bras Psiquiatr. 1968;17(1):131-9.
8
The Psychoanalytic Review: 100 years of history.《精神分析评论》:百年历史。
Psychoanal Rev. 2013 Feb;100(1):1-56. doi: 10.1521/prev.2013.100.1.1.
9
British psychiatry in the 20th century--observations from a psychiatric journal.20世纪的英国精神病学——来自一份精神病学杂志的观察
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Aug;53(3):349-56. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00338-5.
10
Class and gender in twentieth-century British psychiatry: shell-shock and psychopathic disorder.
Clio Med. 2004;73:295-322.

引用本文的文献

1
Harvey Cushing and Sigmund Freud shaking hands: How electrical brain stimulation became a psychoanalytic method to study the unconscious (1870-1955).哈维·库欣与西格蒙德·弗洛伊德握手:脑电刺激如何成为一种研究无意识的精神分析方法(1870 - 1955)
Hist Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;36(1-3):16-31. doi: 10.1177/0957154X251318494. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Society as Cause and Cure: The Norms of Transgender Social Medicine.社会作为病因与治疗:跨性别社会医学的规范。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;45(3):456-478. doi: 10.1007/s11013-021-09727-4. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Psychiatry and the Sociology of Novelty: Negotiating the US National Institute of Mental Health "Research Domain Criteria" (RDoC).
精神病学与新奇事物社会学:解读美国国立精神卫生研究所的“研究领域标准”(RDoC)
Sci Technol Human Values. 2019 Jul;44(4):612-633. doi: 10.1177/0162243919841693. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Digitising psychiatry? Sociotechnical expectations, performative nominalism and biomedical virtue in (digital) psychiatric praxis.数字化精神病学?(数字)精神病学实践中的社会技术期望、表现性唯名论和生物医学美德。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Oct;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12811. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
5
"The wondrous eyes of a new technology"-a history of the early electroencephalography (EEG) of psychopathy, delinquency, and immorality.“新科技的奇妙之眼”-精神变态、犯罪和不道德的早期脑电图(EEG)历史。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 17;8:232. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00232. eCollection 2014.
6
What is psychiatry? Co-producing complexity in mental health.什么是精神病学?共同制造心理健康领域的复杂性。
Soc Theory Health. 2012 Nov;10(4):328-347. doi: 10.1057/sth.2012.9. Epub 2012 Jul 25.