Behavioral and Social Sciences, Theory and History of Psychology, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 17;8:232. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00232. eCollection 2014.
This article presents a history of the early electroencephalography (EEG) of psychopathy, delinquency, and immorality in Great Britain and the United States in the 1940s and 1950s. Then, EEG was a novel research tool that promised ground-breaking insights in psychiatry and criminology. Experts explored its potential regarding the diagnosis, classification, etiology, and treatment of unethical and unlawful persons. This line of research yielded tentative and inconsistent findings, which the experts attributed to methodological and theoretical shortcomings. Accordingly, the scientific community discussed the reliability, validity, and utility of EEG, and launched initiatives to calibrate and standardize the novel tool. The analysis shows that knowledge production, gauging of the research tool, and attempts to establish credibility for EEG in the study of immoral persons occurred simultaneously. The paper concludes with a reflection on the similarities between EEG and neuroimaging-the prime research tool in the current neuroscience of morality-and calls for a critical assessment of their potentials and limitations in the study of immorality and crime.
本文追溯了 20 世纪 40 年代和 50 年代英美两国在精神病学和犯罪学领域中对精神变态、犯罪和不道德的早期脑电描记术(EEG)研究的历史。当时,EEG 是一种新的研究工具,有望在精神病学和犯罪学领域取得突破性的见解。专家们探索了它在不道德和非法人员的诊断、分类、病因和治疗方面的潜力。这一系列研究得出了初步的、不一致的发现,专家们将这些发现归因于方法和理论上的不足。因此,科学界讨论了 EEG 的可靠性、有效性和实用性,并发起了校准和标准化这一新型工具的倡议。分析表明,知识的产生、研究工具的衡量以及试图在不道德人群的研究中为 EEG 建立可信度是同时发生的。本文最后反思了 EEG 与神经影像学(目前道德神经科学的主要研究工具)之间的相似之处,并呼吁对它们在不道德和犯罪研究中的潜力和局限性进行批判性评估。