McMaster Brain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Nutr. 2011 Oct;141(10):1813-8. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.136689. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
Probiotic lactic acid bacteria have been reported to alleviate symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. However, they have not been tested for use in functional gastric disease. We therefore investigated if strains previously shown to protect from response to colorectal distension (CRD) in rats also modulate response to gastric distension (GD). Healthy, male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with viable, heat-killed, gamma-irradiated Lactobacillus reuteri or viable Lactobacillus plantarum wild type (WT), L. plantarum Dlt¯mutant, conditioned medium or medium control (9 d), and subjected to GD under anesthesia using an i.g. Teflon catheter. Effects were measured by heart rate (HR) changes during noxious distension (60 mm Hg) compared to baseline HR values. We also investigated the localization of viable, green fluorescent protein-transfected bacteria in the stomach mucosa. Viable L. reuteri decreased the bradycardia induced by noxious GD compared to placebo controls (P < 0.001). Heat-killed or gamma-irradiated L. reuteri and conditioned medium did not have a protective effect in GD. Viable L. plantarum WT and Dlt¯mutant, previously shown to be effective antinociceptive agents in CRD, showed no protective effect in GD. All viable bacteria were associated with the pars glandularis of the rat stomach. Thus, we conclude that the antinociceptive mechanisms of action of probiotic bacteria differ between the stomach and the colon. Symptom alleviation cannot be attributed to the localization of the bacteria in the stomach. Information derived from effects of CRD cannot be extrapolated to effects in the stomach, which are likely to be strain and organ specific.
益生菌乳酸杆菌已被报道可缓解肠易激综合征患者的症状。然而,它们尚未在功能性胃病中进行测试。因此,我们研究了以前证明可保护大鼠对结直肠扩张(CRD)反应的菌株是否也可调节对胃扩张(GD)的反应。健康雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠用活菌、热灭活、γ 射线照射的鼠李糖乳杆菌或活菌植物乳杆菌野生型(WT)、植物乳杆菌 Dlt¯突变体、条件培养基或培养基对照(9d)处理,并在全身麻醉下通过 i.g. 用 Teflon 导管进行 GD。通过与基础 HR 值相比在有害扩张(60mmHg)期间的心率(HR)变化来测量效果。我们还研究了活菌、绿色荧光蛋白转染细菌在胃黏膜中的定位。与安慰剂对照相比,活菌鼠李糖乳杆菌降低了有害 GD 引起的心动过缓(P < 0.001)。热灭活或γ 射线照射的鼠李糖乳杆菌和条件培养基在 GD 中没有保护作用。以前在 CRD 中显示出有效镇痛作用的活菌植物乳杆菌 WT 和 Dlt¯突变体在 GD 中没有保护作用。所有活菌均与大鼠胃的腺区有关。因此,我们得出结论,益生菌细菌在胃和结肠中的作用机制不同。症状缓解不能归因于细菌在胃中的定位。从 CRD 效果中得出的信息不能推断出胃中的效果,这可能与菌株和器官特异性有关。