• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中枢性疼痛作为一种丘脑皮质节律紊乱:丘脑传出神经切断?

Central Pain as a Thalamocortical Dysrhythmia: A Thalamic Efference Disconnection?

作者信息

Walton Kerry D., Llinás Rodolfo R.

PMID:21882456
Abstract

The intrinsic electrical properties of neurons are presently considered as a salient parameter in brain function (Llinas 1988; Getting 1989; Connors and Gutnick 1990; Turrigiano et al. 1994; Margolis and Detwiler 2007). This is in contrast to the classical purely reflexological view, where neurons are considered to be passive agents that are activated or inhibited synaptically. This intrinsic functional view has been addressed in recent years in relation to thalamic neuron function and to its recurrent interaction with the cortex. Such a view is based upon single-cell neuronal electrophysiology (c.f. Llinas 1988; Steriade and Llinas 1988), and thalamocortical anatomy (Jones 2007). The neurological consequences of such a perspective (Llinas et al. 1999) have been corroborated by magnetoencephalography (MEG), single-cell intraoperative recordings, and encouraging surgical outcomes (Jeanmonod et al. 1996, 2001b, 2003). Moreover, as in the case of tinnitus, where a sound stimulus can suppress the centrally generated sensation (Coles and Hallam 1987), central pain can be modulated by peripheral stimulus (Somers and Somers 1999; Inui et al. 2006). From a functional imaging perspective, electroencephalogram (EEG) (Jeanmonod et al. 1993) and MEG data have shown the presence of a distinct increase in low-frequency activation in central pain (Schulman et al. 2005). In all patients with central, but not peripheral, pain, there was a second site of low-frequency oscillations that was localized to the mesial/orbito frontal and anterior cingulated cortices, as well as the temporal (insular) cortex. Central pain patients with these MEG characteristics did not respond to spinal cord stimulation. By contrast, patients without the frontal low-frequency component responded well to such stimulation. In addition to clinical studies, direct experimental evidence for the functional organization of the thalamo-cortico-thalamo loop has been obtained in studies of rodent thalamocortical slices (Llinas et al. 2002) that have been extended to animal studies concerning neuropathic pain (Gerke et al. 2003; Kim et al. 2003) and thalamic deafferentation (Wang and Thompson 2008). These latter results have established a direct relationship between abnormal thalamic rhythmicity and the occurrence of central pain. The relevance of an “essential thalamic structure” (i.e., a central generator) for neuropathic pain was first suggested by Head (Head and Holmes 1911). The findings summarized here extend this original proposal by addressing brain activity obtained from MEG, EEG, and preoperative unit recordings from patients with chronic neuropathic pain. We also briefly touch upon the contribution of animal studies to understanding the cellular and molecular components of neuropathic pain generation in the context of increased T-type calcium channel activty.

摘要

目前,神经元的内在电特性被视为脑功能的一个显著参数(利纳斯,1988年;格廷,1989年;康纳斯和古特尼克,1990年;图里贾诺等人,1994年;马戈利斯和德特维勒,2007年)。这与经典的纯反射学观点形成对比,在经典观点中,神经元被视为通过突触被激活或抑制的被动因子。近年来,这种内在功能观点已与丘脑神经元功能及其与皮层的反复相互作用相关联。这种观点基于单细胞神经元电生理学(参见利纳斯,1988年;斯特里亚德和利纳斯,1988年)以及丘脑皮质解剖学(琼斯,2007年)。这种观点的神经学后果(利纳斯等人,1999年)已通过脑磁图(MEG)、术中单细胞记录以及令人鼓舞的手术结果得到证实(让莫诺等人,1996年、2001b、2003年)。此外,就像耳鸣的情况一样,声音刺激可以抑制中枢产生的感觉(科尔斯和哈勒姆,1987年),中枢性疼痛也可以通过外周刺激进行调节(萨默斯和萨默斯,1999年;井上等,2006年)。从功能成像的角度来看,脑电图(EEG)(让莫诺等人,1993年)和MEG数据显示,中枢性疼痛中低频激活明显增加(舒尔曼等人,2005年)。在所有患有中枢性而非外周性疼痛的患者中,存在第二个低频振荡部位,其位于内侧/眶额和前扣带回皮层以及颞(岛叶)皮层。具有这些MEG特征的中枢性疼痛患者对脊髓刺激无反应。相比之下,没有额叶低频成分的患者对这种刺激反应良好。除了临床研究之外,在对啮齿动物丘脑皮质切片的研究(利纳斯等人,2002年)中已经获得了丘脑 - 皮质 - 丘脑环路功能组织的直接实验证据,这些研究已扩展到关于神经性疼痛的动物研究(格克等人,2003年;金等人,2003年)以及丘脑去传入(王和汤普森,2008年)。后一组结果确立了丘脑节律异常与中枢性疼痛发生之间的直接关系。“基本丘脑结构”(即中枢发生器)与神经性疼痛的相关性最早由黑德提出(黑德和霍姆斯,1911年)。这里总结的发现通过探讨从MEG、EEG以及慢性神经性疼痛患者术前单位记录中获得的脑活动,扩展了这一最初的提议。我们还简要提及了动物研究在理解T型钙通道活性增加情况下神经性疼痛产生的细胞和分子成分方面的贡献。

相似文献

1
Central Pain as a Thalamocortical Dysrhythmia: A Thalamic Efference Disconnection?中枢性疼痛作为一种丘脑皮质节律紊乱:丘脑传出神经切断?
2
Multielectrode Recordings in the Somatosensory System体感系统中的多电极记录
3
The olivo-cerebellar system: a key to understanding the functional significance of intrinsic oscillatory brain properties.橄榄小脑系统:理解大脑内在振荡特性功能意义的关键。
Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Jan 28;7:96. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00096. eCollection 2013.
4
Auditory thalamic circuits and GABA receptor function: Putative mechanisms in tinnitus pathology.听觉丘脑回路与GABA受体功能:耳鸣病理中的潜在机制。
Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
5
Abnormal thalamocortical activity in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) type I.复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)I 型患者丘脑皮质活动异常。
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
6
Imaging of thalamocortical dysrhythmia in neuropsychiatry.神经精神影像学中的丘脑皮质节律障碍。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jul 29;5:69. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00069. eCollection 2011.
7
Chronic Neuropathic Pain: It's about the Rhythm.慢性神经性疼痛:关乎节律。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):1008-18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2768-15.2016.
8
Clinical and experimental insight into pathophysiology, comorbidity and therapy of absence seizures.对失神发作的病理生理学、共病和治疗的临床和实验见解。
Brain. 2020 Aug 1;143(8):2341-2368. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa072.
9
Temporal dynamics of cortical sources underlying spontaneous and peripherally evoked slow waves.自发和外周诱发慢波下皮质源的时间动态。
Prog Brain Res. 2011;193:201-18. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53839-0.00013-2.
10
Increased Low- and High-Frequency Oscillatory Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex of Fibromyalgia Patients.纤维肌痛患者前额叶皮质低频和高频振荡活动增加。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 14;10:111. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00111. eCollection 2016.