Dept. of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Dec;111(6):1527-38. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00895.2011. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Reductions in oxygen availability (O(2)) by either reduced arterial O(2) content or reduced perfusion pressure can have profound influences on the circulation, including vasodilation in skeletal muscle vascular beds. The purpose of this review is to put into context the present evidence regarding mechanisms responsible for the local control of blood flow during acute systemic hypoxia and/or local hypoperfusion in contracting muscle. The combination of submaximal exercise and hypoxia produces a "compensatory" vasodilation and augmented blood flow in contracting muscles relative to the same level of exercise under normoxic conditions. A similar compensatory vasodilation is observed in response to local reductions in oxygen availability (i.e., hypoperfusion) during normoxic exercise. Available evidence suggests that nitric oxide (NO) contributes to the compensatory dilator response under each of these conditions, whereas adenosine appears to only play a role during hypoperfusion. During systemic hypoxia the NO-mediated component of the compensatory vasodilation is regulated through a β-adrenergic receptor mechanism at low-intensity exercise, while an additional (not yet identified) source of NO is likely to be engaged as exercise intensity increases during hypoxia. Potential candidates for stimulating and/or interacting with NO at higher exercise intensities include prostaglandins and/or ATP. Conversely, prostaglandins do not appear to play a role in the compensatory vasodilation during exercise with hypoperfusion. Taken together, the data for both hypoxia and hypoperfusion suggest NO is important in the compensatory vasodilation seen when oxygen availability is limited. This is important from a basic biological perspective and also has pathophysiological implications for diseases associated with either hypoxia or hypoperfusion.
氧气供应减少(O2),无论是通过降低动脉氧含量还是降低灌注压,都会对循环系统产生深远影响,包括骨骼肌血管床的血管扩张。本综述的目的是将目前关于急性全身缺氧和/或收缩肌肉局部低灌注期间局部控制血流的机制的证据置于上下文中。亚最大运动与缺氧相结合会导致“代偿性”血管扩张,相对于正常氧条件下相同水平的运动,收缩肌肉的血流量增加。在正常氧运动期间,当氧气可用性(即低灌注)降低时,也会观察到类似的代偿性血管扩张。现有证据表明,在这些情况下,一氧化氮(NO)有助于代偿性扩张反应,而腺苷似乎仅在低灌注时起作用。在全身缺氧期间,NO 介导的代偿性血管扩张的组成部分在低强度运动时通过β-肾上腺素能受体机制进行调节,而随着缺氧时运动强度的增加,可能会涉及到另外的(尚未确定)NO 来源。在较高运动强度下刺激和/或与 NO 相互作用的潜在候选物包括前列腺素和/或 ATP。相反,前列腺素在低灌注运动期间的代偿性血管扩张中似乎不起作用。总而言之,缺氧和低灌注的数据均表明,NO 在氧气供应有限时的代偿性血管扩张中很重要。这从基础生物学的角度来看很重要,并且对于与缺氧或低灌注相关的疾病也具有病理生理学意义。