Wright Alexis A, Abbott J Haxby, Baxter Dave, Cook Chad
School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Sep;18(3):166-72. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712536.
THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY WERE TO: (1) determine the association of a within-session finding after traction of the hip with self-report of well-being, pain, and self-report of function at 9 weeks; and (2) to determine if the interactions between the within-session finding and the outcome measure are different between groups of patients with hip OA who receive and who do not receive manual therapy.
Data were retrospectively analysed in 70 subjects who were part of a randomized control trial. Correlation analyses of within-session findings from the initial visit after traction of a concordantly painful hip were compared to self-report measures for function, pain, and well-being at 9 weeks. A comparison of slope coefficients between manual therapy and non-manual therapy groups was performed to determine the interactive aspects of the within-session finding.
Although the correlations for the manual therapy group were higher than for the supervised neglect group, none of the correlational analyses for both groups was strong or significant. Significant differences in the slope coefficients for well-being and pain were found, suggesting that the interactions between the within-session findings and the targeted outcomes were different in the manual therapy group versus supervised neglect group.
These findings suggest that within-session findings during the initial evaluation are not strongly related to a positive outcome after manual therapy, although the interaction of the finding of a within-session change and the use of manual therapy is more compelling than the finding in a sample of patients who did not receive manual therapy.
本研究的目的是:(1)确定髋关节牵引后单次治疗结果与9周时的幸福感自我报告、疼痛及功能自我报告之间的关联;(2)确定在接受和未接受手法治疗的髋骨关节炎患者组中,单次治疗结果与结局指标之间的相互作用是否存在差异。
对70名参与随机对照试验的受试者的数据进行回顾性分析。将疼痛一致的髋关节牵引后首次就诊时的单次治疗结果与9周时功能、疼痛和幸福感的自我报告指标进行相关性分析。对手法治疗组和非手法治疗组的斜率系数进行比较,以确定单次治疗结果的交互作用方面。
尽管手法治疗组的相关性高于监督性忽视组,但两组的相关性分析均不强或不显著。发现幸福感和疼痛的斜率系数存在显著差异,这表明手法治疗组与监督性忽视组相比,单次治疗结果与目标结局之间的相互作用有所不同。
这些结果表明,初始评估期间的单次治疗结果与手法治疗后的积极结局没有强烈关联,尽管单次治疗变化的结果与手法治疗的使用之间的相互作用比未接受手法治疗的患者样本中的结果更具说服力。