3R Research Centre, Central Animal Laboratory, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lab Anim. 2011 Oct;45(4):268-70. doi: 10.1258/la.2011.011056. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
Collecting and analysing all available literature before starting a new animal experiment is important and it is indispensable when writing systematic reviews of animal research. In practice, finding all animal studies relevant to a specific research question turns out to be anything but simple. In order to facilitate this search process, we previously developed a search filter for retrieving animal studies in the most often used biomedical database, PubMed. It is a general requirement for systematic reviews, however, that at least two databases are searched. In this report, we therefore present a similar search filter for a second important database, namely Embase. We show that our filter retrieves more animal studies than (a combination of) the options currently available in Embase. Our search filters for PubMed and Embase therefore represent valuable tools for improving the quality of (systematic) reviews and thereby of new animal experiments.
在开展新的动物实验之前,收集和分析所有可用的文献非常重要,在撰写动物研究的系统综述时更是必不可少。实际上,要找到与特定研究问题相关的所有动物研究绝非易事。为了方便搜索过程,我们之前开发了一个搜索过滤器,用于在最常用的生物医学数据库 PubMed 中检索动物研究。然而,对于系统综述来说,至少要搜索两个数据库。因此,在本报告中,我们为第二个重要数据库 Embase 提供了一个类似的搜索过滤器。我们证明,我们的过滤器检索到的动物研究比 Embase 中当前可用的选项(组合)多。因此,我们的 PubMed 和 Embase 搜索过滤器是提高(系统)综述质量的有价值工具,从而也提高了新动物实验的质量。