Suppr超能文献

短暂的睡眠干预可改善入学年的预后:一项随机对照试验。

A brief sleep intervention improves outcomes in the school entry year: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2011 Oct;128(4):692-701. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0409. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of screening for child sleep problems and the efficacy of a behavioral sleep intervention in improving child and parent outcomes in the first year of schooling.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was nested in a population survey performed at 22 elementary schools in Melbourne, Australia. Intervention involved 2 to 3 consultations that covered behavioral sleep strategies for children whose screening results were positive for a moderate/severe sleep problem. Outcomes were parent-reported child sleep problem (primary outcome), sleep habits, psychosocial health-related quality of life, behavior, and parent mental health (all at 3, 6, and 12 months) and blinded, face-to-face learning assessment (at 6 months).

RESULTS

The screening survey was completed by 1512 parents; 161 (10.8%) reported a moderate/severe child sleep problem, and 108 of 136 (79.2% of those eligible) entered the trial. Sleep problems tended to resolve more rapidly in intervention children. Sleep problems affected 33% of 54 intervention children versus 43% of 54 control children at 3 months (P = .3), 25.5% vs 46.8% at 6 months (P = .03), and 32% vs 33% at 12 months (P = .8). Sustained sleep-habit improvements were evident at 3, 6, and 12 months (effect sizes: 0.33 [P = .03]; 0.51 [P = .003]; and 0.40 [P = .02]; respectively), and there were initial marked improvements in psychosocial scores that diminished over time (effect sizes: 0.47 [P = .02]; 0.41 [P = .09]; and 0.26 [P = .3]; respectively). Better prosocial behavior was evident at 12 months (effect size: 0.35; P = .03), and learning and parent outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

School-based screening for sleep problems followed by a targeted, brief behavioral sleep intervention is feasible and has benefits relevant to school transition.

摘要

目的

确定筛查儿童睡眠问题的可行性,以及行为性睡眠干预对改善儿童和家长在入学第一年的相关成果的效果。

方法

一项随机对照试验嵌套在澳大利亚墨尔本的 22 所小学进行的人群调查中。干预措施包括 2 到 3 次咨询,涵盖对筛查结果显示存在中度/重度睡眠问题的儿童的行为性睡眠策略。主要结局是家长报告的儿童睡眠问题(主要结局)、睡眠习惯、与心理健康相关的生活质量、行为以及家长心理健康(均在 3、6 和 12 个月时评估)和盲法、面对面学习评估(在 6 个月时评估)。

结果

共有 1512 位家长完成了筛查调查,其中 161 位(10.8%)报告儿童存在中度/重度睡眠问题,136 位中符合条件的 108 位(79.2%)进入了试验。干预组儿童的睡眠问题往往能更快地得到解决。在 3 个月时,干预组 54 名儿童中有 33%存在睡眠问题,而对照组 54 名儿童中有 43%存在睡眠问题(P =.3);6 个月时分别为 25.5%和 46.8%(P =.03);12 个月时分别为 32%和 33%(P =.8)。在 3、6 和 12 个月时,持续的睡眠习惯改善是明显的(效应量:0.33 [P =.03];0.51 [P =.003];0.40 [P =.02]),并且心理社会评分最初有显著改善,但随着时间的推移而减弱(效应量:0.47 [P =.02];0.41 [P =.09];0.26 [P =.3])。12 个月时,亲社会行为更为明显(效应量:0.35;P =.03),学习和家长结局在两组之间相似。

结论

以学校为基础的睡眠问题筛查,然后进行有针对性的、简短的行为性睡眠干预是可行的,并且对学校过渡有相关益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验