Suppr超能文献

依托咪酯环糊精制剂:首次人体剂量反应研究,重点关注注射痛。

Propofol in a modified cyclodextrin formulation: first human study of dose-response with emphasis on injection pain.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):738-41. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b8648. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new lipid-free preparation of propofol has been developed containing the drug, sulfobutylether ß-cyclodextrin and water. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of propofol in the lipid formulation with those of the new cyclodextrin formulation, particularly with regard to pain on injection. We hypothesized that the propofol in cyclodextrin would be associated with less pain on injection than propofol in lipid.

METHODS

The study was a single-center, double-blind, 2-period, randomized, dose-escalating study using a completely balanced cross-over design in healthy volunteers. Pain on injection was compared between propofol in cyclodextrin and propofol in lipid using subject and observer assessments of pain rated at several different time points. Five response variables to pain were analyzed.

RESULTS

Propofol in cyclodextrin had significantly higher pain scores for all 5 variables. Other endpoints, including sedation, showed no difference.

CONCLUSION

The propofol in cyclodextrin formulation failed to reduce the pain on injection associated with propofol.

摘要

背景

一种新的无脂丙泊酚制剂已被开发出来,其中含有药物、磺丁基醚-β-环糊精和水。本研究的主要目的是比较脂制剂和新的环糊精制剂中丙泊酚的作用,特别是注射时的疼痛。我们假设环糊精中的丙泊酚与脂制剂中的丙泊酚相比,注射时疼痛会更少。

方法

这是一项单中心、双盲、2 期、随机、剂量递增的研究,在健康志愿者中采用完全平衡的交叉设计。使用受试者和观察者对疼痛的评估,在几个不同的时间点比较环糊精丙泊酚和脂丙泊酚的注射疼痛。分析了 5 个疼痛反应变量。

结果

环糊精丙泊酚在所有 5 个变量上的疼痛评分都明显更高。其他终点,包括镇静,没有差异。

结论

环糊精制剂中的丙泊酚未能减轻与丙泊酚相关的注射疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验