• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高宜居性农村地区的人口增长:它会给长期居民带来社会经济效益吗?

Population Growth in High-Amenity Rural Areas: Does it Bring Socioeconomic Benefits for Long-Term Residents?

作者信息

Onge Jarron M Saint, Hunter Lori M, Boardman Jason D

机构信息

University of Colorado at Boulder.

出版信息

Soc Sci Q. 2007 Jun;88(2):366-381. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00462.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00462.x
PMID:21892234
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3165046/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A widely noted concern with amenity-driven rural population growth is its potential to yield only low-wage service-sector employment for long-term residents, while raising local costs of living. This research examines change in socioeconomic status during the 1990s for long-term residents of high-amenity, high-growth rural counties in the United States. METHODS: Using longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, in combination with county-level information, we estimate growth-curve models to examine the extent to which the socioeconomic status of long-term residents is associated with amenity-related in-migration. RESULTS: We find that, on average, residents in high-growth, amenity-rich rural areas have higher income growth over time and higher levels of initial occupational prestige compared to those from other rural areas, but that socioeconomic gains are primarily for individuals with low baseline prestige. CONCLUSIONS: The socioeconomic gains made by long-term residents of high-growth, amenity-rich rural areas associated with net in-migration may be limited to individuals with low initial prestige and growth may be due to low-skill service-sector jobs.

摘要

目的

一个广受关注的问题是,由便利设施驱动的农村人口增长可能只会为长期居民带来低薪服务业就业机会,同时推高当地生活成本。本研究考察了20世纪90年代美国高便利设施、高增长农村县长期居民的社会经济地位变化。方法:利用收入动态面板研究的纵向数据,结合县级信息,我们估计增长曲线模型,以考察长期居民的社会经济地位与与便利设施相关的迁入之间的关联程度。结果:我们发现,平均而言,与其他农村地区的居民相比,高增长、便利设施丰富的农村地区居民随着时间推移收入增长更高,初始职业声望水平也更高,但社会经济收益主要集中在基线声望较低的个人身上。结论:与净迁入相关的高增长、便利设施丰富的农村地区长期居民所获得的社会经济收益可能仅限于初始声望较低的个人,增长可能归因于低技能服务业工作。

相似文献

1
Population Growth in High-Amenity Rural Areas: Does it Bring Socioeconomic Benefits for Long-Term Residents?高宜居性农村地区的人口增长:它会给长期居民带来社会经济效益吗?
Soc Sci Q. 2007 Jun;88(2):366-381. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00462.x.
2
The Association Between Natural Amenities, Rural Population Growth, and Long-Term Residents' Economic Well-Being.自然便利设施、农村人口增长与长期居民经济福祉之间的关联
Rural Sociol. 2005 Dec;70(4):452-469. doi: 10.1526/003601105775012714.
3
Amenity Migration and Public Lands: Rise of the Protected Areas.舒适区迁移与公共土地:保护区的兴起。
Environ Manage. 2020 Jul;66(1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01293-6. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Measuring the attractiveness of rural communities in accounting for differences of rural primary care workforce supply.衡量农村社区在解释农村初级保健劳动力供应差异方面的吸引力。
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):3925. doi: 10.22605/RRH3925. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
Amenities and wage premiums: the role of services.
Ann Reg Sci. 2022 Nov 13:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s00168-022-01188-w.
6
Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review.缩短失业救济期限以提高就业找到率:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-194. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.2. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Mortality Rates Among Older Adults Living in US Rural vs Urban Counties From 1968 to 2016.评估 1968 年至 2016 年美国农村与城市县老年人死亡率的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12241.
8
Farm population of the United States: 1986.美国农业人口:1986年。
Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact. 1987 Nov(60):1-34.
9
Multinomial logistic models explaining income changes of migrants to high-amenity counties.解释向高宜居性县迁移者收入变化的多项逻辑模型。
Rev Reg Stud. 1992 Summer;22(1):25-42.
10
Do California counties with lower socioeconomic levels have less access to emergency department care?加利福尼亚州社会经济水平较低的县是否获得急诊护理的机会较少?
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):508-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00734.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prestige and gender role ideology: a study of young Tanzanian men.威望与性别角色意识形态:一项对坦桑尼亚年轻男性的研究。
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Feb 14;7:e10. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2025.4. eCollection 2025.
2
Change in U.S. Small Town Community Capitals, 1980-2010.1980 - 2010年美国小镇社区资本的变化
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2020 Oct;39(5):913-940. doi: 10.1007/s11113-020-09609-4. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between Natural Amenities, Rural Population Growth, and Long-Term Residents' Economic Well-Being.自然便利设施、农村人口增长与长期居民经济福祉之间的关联
Rural Sociol. 2005 Dec;70(4):452-469. doi: 10.1526/003601105775012714.
2
Migration with a composite amenity: the role of rents.带有复合便利设施的人口迁移:租金的作用。
J Reg Sci. 1983 Nov;23(4):541-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1983.tb01009.x.
3
Elevating the voices of rural minority women.提升农村少数族裔女性的声音。
Am J Public Health. 2002 Apr;92(4):514-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.4.514.
4
Social class: the missing link in U.S. health data.社会阶层:美国健康数据中缺失的环节。
Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(1):25-44. doi: 10.2190/2JG7-YMD5-WCP2-XXNT.