• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半硬性输尿管镜检查:既往同侧输尿管内操作对结石清除率的影响。

Semirigid ureteroscopy: the effect of previous ipsilateral intraureteral manipulations on stone clearance.

作者信息

Kurtulus Fatih O, Avcı Egemen, Tandogdu Zafer, Gungor Ruhi, Karaca Sener, Fazlıoglu Adem, Cek Mete

机构信息

Department of Urology, Taksim Teaching Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol Res. 2012 Aug;40(4):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0419-1. Epub 2011 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-011-0419-1
PMID:21892749
Abstract

We investigated whether previous intraureteral manipulations had an effect on the stone-free rates (SFR) after semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with pneumatic lithotripsy. A retrospective review of all patients who were treated for ureteral stones at two different institutions from June 2003 through January 2010 was performed. Data of 161 URS procedures were analyzed. Stone size, location (distal, mid and proximal) and number (single and multiple), patient demographics and previous intraureteral manipulations were recorded. Patients were grouped as having undergone a previous ipsilateral intraureteral manipulation (Group 1) or not (Group 2). Stone location and number, stone clearance and ancillary procedures were compared. There were no significant differences between Group 1 versus Group 2 for age (p > 0.05), gender (p > 0.05), stone site (p > 0.05) and stone size (p > 0.05). Stones with multiple locations were more frequent in Group 1 (18.5%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance between the two groups. Similarly, the frequency of multiple stones was also higher in Group 1 (29.6%). Stone site, diameter and gender were comparable in both groups. Stone-free rate of all patients was 84.6% after the first intervention. This rate increased to 98.1% after secondary procedures. Univariate analysis revealed that SFR after URS were low in patients who underwent previous intraureteral manipulations (Group 1:55.6% vs. Group 2:89.1%). SFR after the first intervention were related with stone size, location and number. Additionally, multiple logistic regression analysis indicated a relationship between previous intraureteral manipulations and initial stone clearance rates. Spontaneous passage of stone fragments after URS was associated with stone burden, location, number and previous intraureteral manipulations. Further multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only previous intraureteral manipulations were associated with the expulsion of the stones left for passage.

摘要

我们研究了既往输尿管内操作是否会对半硬性输尿管镜检查(URS)联合气压弹道碎石术后的无石率(SFR)产生影响。对2003年6月至2010年1月在两家不同机构接受输尿管结石治疗的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。分析了161例URS手术的数据。记录结石大小、位置(远端、中段和近端)和数量(单发和多发)、患者人口统计学信息以及既往输尿管内操作情况。将患者分为曾接受同侧输尿管内操作的组(第1组)和未接受的组(第2组)。比较结石位置和数量、结石清除情况及辅助操作。第1组和第2组在年龄(p>0.05)、性别(p>0.05)、结石部位(p>0.05)和结石大小(p>0.05)方面无显著差异。第1组中多部位结石更为常见(18.5%);然而,两组之间的差异未达到统计学意义。同样,第1组中多发结石的频率也更高(29.6%)。两组的结石部位、直径和性别具有可比性。首次干预后所有患者的无石率为84.6%。二次手术后该率升至98.1%。单因素分析显示,既往接受输尿管内操作的患者(第1组:55.6%对第2组:89.1%)URS后的SFR较低。首次干预后的SFR与结石大小、位置和数量有关。此外,多因素logistic回归分析表明既往输尿管内操作与初始结石清除率之间存在关联。URS后结石碎片的自然排出与结石负荷、位置、数量及既往输尿管内操作有关。进一步的多因素logistic回归分析表明,只有既往输尿管内操作与残留结石的排出有关。

相似文献

1
Semirigid ureteroscopy: the effect of previous ipsilateral intraureteral manipulations on stone clearance.半硬性输尿管镜检查:既往同侧输尿管内操作对结石清除率的影响。
Urol Res. 2012 Aug;40(4):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0419-1. Epub 2011 Sep 4.
2
A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗小于2厘米上段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心经验
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):47-51. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0493.
3
Efficacy of semirigid ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone surface area of greater than 30 mm2.半硬性输尿管镜联合气压弹道碎石术治疗结石表面积大于30 mm²的输尿管结石的疗效
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):619-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0182.
4
Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.比较半刚性输尿管镜、软性输尿管镜和冲击波碎石术治疗 11-20mm 近端输尿管结石的初始治疗效果。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020 Apr 6;92(1):39-44. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2020.1.39.
5
Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective comparative analysis of 124 patients.柔性输尿管肾镜与半刚性输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石:124例患者的回顾性对比分析
Urol J. 2014 Nov 1;11(5):1867-72.
6
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 1999 Nov;36(5):376-9. doi: 10.1159/000020017.
7
Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.体内或体外冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石?结石大小和数量对成功率的影响。
J Endourol. 1998 Aug;12(4):307-12. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.307.
8
Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.总表面积影响冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石的无石结局。
J Endourol. 2019 Aug;33(8):661-666. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0120. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
9
One and done: Feasibility and Safety of Primary Ureteroscopy in a Pediatric Population.一次性完成:在儿科人群中进行原发性输尿管镜检查的可行性和安全性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Apr;20(2):224.e1-224.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.031. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
10
Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy Should Not Be the First Option for Proximal Ureteral Stones in Children.半硬性输尿管镜检查不应作为儿童近端输尿管结石的首选方法。
J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1028-1032. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0925. Epub 2018 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of ureteral calculi with semirigid ureteroscopy: where should we stop?半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石:我们该止步于何处?
Urol Int. 2010;84(3):260-4. doi: 10.1159/000288225. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
2
Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis.术前输尿管支架置入对输尿管镜治疗尿路结石疗效的影响。
J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.043. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
3
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using Swiss Lithoclast for treatment of ureteral calculi: 12-years experience.
使用瑞士碎石机进行输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管结石:12年经验
J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Aug;24(4):690-4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.690. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
4
Efficacy of semirigid ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone surface area of greater than 30 mm2.半硬性输尿管镜联合气压弹道碎石术治疗结石表面积大于30 mm²的输尿管结石的疗效
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):619-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0182.
5
2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.《2007年输尿管结石管理指南》
Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1610-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039.
6
Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates.呈现可提高输尿管镜下结石清除率。 (不过原句“Prestenting”可能有误,推测可能是“Presenting” )
J Endourol. 2007 Nov;21(11):1277-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9888.
7
Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管结石。从文献中我们能了解到哪些关于治疗结果和治疗方法的信息?
Urol Res. 2005 Jun;33(3):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0462-x. Epub 2005 May 29.
8
Management of ureteric stones.输尿管结石的管理
Eur Urol. 2004 Jun;45(6):714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.018.
9
Management of ureteral stones with pneumatic lithotripsy: report of 500 patients.
J Endourol. 2003 Nov;17(9):721-4. doi: 10.1089/089277903770802236.
10
Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.非增强螺旋CT显示输尿管结石自然排出与结石大小及位置的关系。
J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1644.