Suppr超能文献

如何可靠地测量咿呀学语的开始?

How to measure the onset of babbling reliably?

机构信息

University of Antwerp.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2012 Jun;39(3):523-52. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000171. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

Abstract

Various measures for identifying the onset of babbling have been proposed in the literature, but a formal definition of the exact procedure and a thorough validation of the sample size required for reliably establishing babbling onset is lacking. In this paper the reliability of five commonly used measures is assessed using a large longitudinal corpus of spontaneous speech from forty infants (age 0 ; 6-2 ; 0). In a first experiment it is shown that establishing the onset of babbling with reasonable (95%) confidence is impossible when the measures are computed only once, and when the number of vocalizations are not equal for all children at all ages. In addition, each measure requires a different minimal sample size. In the second experiment a robust procedure is proposed and formally defined that permits the identification of the onset of babbling with 95% confidence. The bootstrapping procedure involves extensive resampling and requires relatively few data.

摘要

在文献中已经提出了各种用于识别咿呀学语开始的方法,但对于准确程序的正式定义以及可靠确定咿呀学语开始所需的样本量的充分验证还缺乏研究。在本文中,使用四十名婴儿(年龄 0 ; 6-2 ; 0)的大量纵向自发言语语料库,评估了五种常用方法的可靠性。在第一个实验中,当仅计算一次并且在所有年龄段,并非所有儿童的发声次数都相等时,表明使用这些方法合理地(95%置信度)确定咿呀学语的开始是不可能的。此外,每个测量方法都需要不同的最小样本量。在第二个实验中,提出并正式定义了一种稳健的程序,该程序可以以 95%的置信度确定咿呀学语的开始。引导程序涉及广泛的重采样,并且仅需要相对较少的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验