• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者使用阿巴西普治疗的长期安全性、疗效和放射学进展抑制:AIM 试验 3 年结果。

Long-term safety, efficacy and inhibition of radiographic progression with abatacept treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: 3-year results from the AIM trial.

机构信息

Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, 1367 Washington Ave, Albany, NY 12206, USA.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Oct;70(10):1826-30. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.139345.

DOI:10.1136/ard.2010.139345
PMID:21893583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3171107/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate abatacept treatment over 3 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

Patients randomised to abatacept or placebo (+MTX) during the 1-year double-blind period of the Abatacept in Inadequate responders to Methotrexate (AIM) trial received open-label abatacept (+MTX) in the long-term extension (LTE). Safety was assessed for patients who received ≥ 1 dose of abatacept, regardless of randomisation group. Efficacy was assessed for patients randomised to abatacept who entered the LTE.

RESULTS

433 and 219 patients were randomised and treated with abatacept or placebo, respectively; 378 and 161 entered the LTE. At year 3, 440/539 patients were ongoing. No unexpected safety events were observed in the LTE. By year 3, incidence rates of adverse event and serious adverse events were 249.8/100 and 15.1/100 patient-years, respectively. Incidence rates were generally stable over time. At year 3, 84.8%, 63.4% and 37.5% of patients achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria of 20, 50 and 70, respectively, compared with 82.3%, 54.3% and 32.4% of patients at year 1. Mean changes in Genant-modified Sharp scores were reduced progressively over 3 years, with significantly greater inhibition during year 3 compared with year 2 (p=0.022 for total score).

CONCLUSION

In MTX-inadequate responders with RA, abatacept provided consistent safety and sustained efficacy over 3 years. The data suggest an increasing inhibitory disease-modifying effect on radiographic progression.

摘要

目的

评估阿巴西普治疗对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗反应不佳的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者 3 年的效果。

方法

在 Abatacept 在甲氨蝶呤治疗反应不足的患者中(AIM)试验的 1 年双盲期随机分配至阿巴西普或安慰剂(+MTX)的患者在长期扩展(LTE)中接受开放标签的阿巴西普(+MTX)治疗。无论随机分组如何,均评估了接受≥1 剂阿巴西普治疗的患者的安全性。对随机分配至阿巴西普并进入 LTE 的患者进行疗效评估。

结果

分别有 433 名和 219 名患者随机接受阿巴西普或安慰剂治疗,分别有 378 名和 161 名患者进入 LTE。在第 3 年,440/539 名患者仍在继续治疗。在 LTE 中未观察到意外的安全性事件。到第 3 年,不良事件和严重不良事件的发生率分别为 249.8/100 和 15.1/100 患者年。发生率总体上随时间稳定。在第 3 年,分别有 84.8%、63.4%和 37.5%的患者达到美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准的 20、50 和 70,而在第 1 年分别为 82.3%、54.3%和 32.4%。3 年来,Genant 改良 Sharp 评分的平均变化逐渐减少,第 3 年与第 2 年相比,抑制作用显著增加(总评分 p=0.022)。

结论

在 MTX 治疗反应不佳的 RA 患者中,阿巴西普在 3 年内提供了一致的安全性和持续的疗效。数据表明对放射学进展的疾病缓解作用逐渐增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a3/3171107/e0548822fd7d/ard-70-10-1826-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a3/3171107/9d22a4ea3eae/ard-70-10-1826-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a3/3171107/e0548822fd7d/ard-70-10-1826-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a3/3171107/9d22a4ea3eae/ard-70-10-1826-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a3/3171107/e0548822fd7d/ard-70-10-1826-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term safety, efficacy and inhibition of radiographic progression with abatacept treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: 3-year results from the AIM trial.甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者使用阿巴西普治疗的长期安全性、疗效和放射学进展抑制:AIM 试验 3 年结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Oct;70(10):1826-30. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.139345.
2
Longterm safety, efficacy, and inhibition of structural damage progression over 5 years of treatment with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the abatacept in inadequate responders to methotrexate trial.在甲氨蝶呤疗效不佳的类风湿关节炎患者中,使用阿巴西普治疗5年的长期安全性、疗效及对结构损伤进展的抑制作用(阿巴西普治疗疗效不佳患者试验)
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;41(6):1077-87. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130263. Epub 2014 May 1.
3
Sustained disease remission and inhibition of radiographic progression in methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors treated with abatacept: 2-year outcomes.在接受阿巴西普治疗的甲氨蝶呤初治、具有不良预后因素的类风湿关节炎患者中,持续缓解疾病和抑制影像学进展:2 年的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Nov;70(11):1949-56. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.145268. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
4
Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy.类风湿关节炎患者对抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗反应不足,接受选择性共刺激调节剂阿巴西普治疗2年后的疗效和安全性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Apr;67(4):547-54. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.074773. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
5
Long-term safety and efficacy of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a 7-year extended study.阿巴西普治疗甲氨蝶呤应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者的 7 年扩展研究:长期安全性和疗效。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):553-62. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
6
Abatacept plus methotrexate provides incremental clinical benefits versus methotrexate alone in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who achieve radiographic nonprogression.阿巴西普联合甲氨蝶呤相较于甲氨蝶呤单药治疗在影像学无进展的甲氨蝶呤初治早期类风湿关节炎患者中提供了额外的临床获益。
J Rheumatol. 2011 Nov;38(11):2362-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110054. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
7
Efficacy and safety of abatacept or infliximab vs placebo in ATTEST: a phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate.阿巴西普或英夫利昔单抗对比安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎(对甲氨蝶呤反应不足)的疗效与安全性:ATTEST一项III期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Aug;67(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.080002. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
8
Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors.阿巴西普在未使用甲氨蝶呤的早期类风湿关节炎且具有不良预后因素患者中的临床疗效与安全性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1870-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101121. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
9
Long-term safety and efficacy of treatment with subcutaneous abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are methotrexate inadequate responders.皮下注射阿巴西普治疗对甲氨蝶呤反应不佳的日本类风湿关节炎患者的长期安全性和疗效。
Mod Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;25(5):665-71. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1012786.
10
Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.阿巴西普对甲氨蝶呤抵抗的活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 20;144(12):865-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-12-200606200-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Abatacept and the risk of malignancy: a meta-analysis across disease indications.阿巴西普与恶性肿瘤风险:跨疾病适应症的荟萃分析
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jun 1;64(6):3280-3287. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf114.
2
Preferable effect of CTLA4-Ig on both bone erosion and bone microarchitecture in rheumatoid arthritis revealed by HR-pQCT.高分辨率 CT 定量分析 CTLA4-Ig 对类风湿关节炎骨侵蚀和骨微结构的改善作用
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77392-9.
3
Abatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive evaluation of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting of long-term extension studies: lack of consistency calls for consensus.长期扩展研究报告:缺乏一致性需要达成共识。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):886-90. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.143420. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
2
Safety and efficacy of the selective costimulation modulator abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate: a 5-year extended phase IIB study.在接受背景甲氨蝶呤治疗的类风湿关节炎患者中,选择性共刺激调节剂阿巴西普的安全性和有效性:一项为期5年的IIB期扩展研究。
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):736-42. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080813. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
3
Malignancies in the rheumatoid arthritis abatacept clinical development programme: an epidemiological assessment.
阿巴西普和类风湿关节炎患者的非黑素瘤皮肤癌:随机对照试验和观察性研究的综合评估。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):177-183. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224356.
4
Safety outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept: results from a multinational surveillance study across seven European registries.接受阿巴西普治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的安全性结局:来自七个欧洲登记处的跨国监测研究结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Jun 12;25(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03067-x.
5
Therapeutic Utility and Adverse Effects of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Inflammatory Arthritis.生物制剂类改善病情抗风湿药物治疗炎症性关节炎的疗效和不良反应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 11;23(22):13913. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213913.
6
Association between serum bone biomarker levels and therapeutic response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a multicenter, prospective, and observational RA ultrasound cohort study in Japan.血清骨生物标志物水平与类风湿关节炎患者接受阿巴西普治疗反应的相关性:日本多中心、前瞻性、观察性 RA 超声队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 1;22(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04392-5.
7
Change of ARASHI scores for large joints in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept for three years: A clinical observational study.使用阿巴西普治疗三年的类风湿关节炎患者大关节ARASHI评分的变化:一项临床观察性研究。
Arch Rheumatol. 2020 Jun 25;36(1):10-18. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.7727. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
A retrospective analysis of the relationship between anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and the effectiveness of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients.回顾性分析抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体与阿巴西普治疗类风湿关节炎患者疗效的关系。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 12;10(1):19717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76842-4.
9
Clinical Utility and Cost Savings in Predicting Inadequate Response to Anti-TNF Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis.预测类风湿关节炎抗TNF治疗反应不足的临床效用及成本节约
Rheumatol Ther. 2020 Dec;7(4):775-792. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00226-3. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Introducing Patterns of Variability for Overcoming Compensatory Adaptation of the Immune System to Immunomodulatory Agents: A Novel Method for Improving Clinical Response to Anti-TNF Therapies.引入免疫调节剂诱导的免疫系统代偿性适应的变异性模式:一种提高抗 TNF 治疗临床反应的新方法。
Front Immunol. 2019 Nov 20;10:2726. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02726. eCollection 2019.
类风湿关节炎阿巴西普临床研发项目中的恶性肿瘤:一项流行病学评估。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1819-26. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.097527. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
4
Results of a two-year followup study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received a combination of abatacept and methotrexate.对接受阿巴西普和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗的类风湿性关节炎患者进行的为期两年的随访研究结果。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr;58(4):953-63. doi: 10.1002/art.23397.
5
Abatacept inhibits progression of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the long-term extension of the AIM trial.阿巴西普可抑制类风湿关节炎的结构损伤进展:AIM试验长期扩展研究结果
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Aug;67(8):1084-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.085084. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
6
Efficacy and safety of abatacept or infliximab vs placebo in ATTEST: a phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate.阿巴西普或英夫利昔单抗对比安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎(对甲氨蝶呤反应不足)的疗效与安全性:ATTEST一项III期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Aug;67(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.080002. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
7
Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial.阿巴西普对甲氨蝶呤抵抗的活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 20;144(12):865-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-12-200606200-00003.
8
Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial.依那西普与甲氨蝶呤单药及联合用药治疗类风湿关节炎的比较:TEMPO研究的两年临床和影像学结果,一项双盲随机试验
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Apr;54(4):1063-74. doi: 10.1002/art.21655.
9
A long-term, open-label trial of the safety and efficacy of etanercept (Enbrel) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis not treated with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.一项关于依那西普(恩利)在未接受其他改善病情抗风湿药物治疗的类风湿关节炎患者中的安全性和有效性的长期开放标签试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Dec;65(12):1578-84. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.038349. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
10
Safety analyses of adalimumab (HUMIRA) in global clinical trials and US postmarketing surveillance of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.阿达木单抗(修美乐)在类风湿性关节炎患者全球临床试验及美国上市后监测中的安全性分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jul;65(7):889-94. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.043166. Epub 2006 Jan 26.