Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 3077, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar;220(1):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2462-6. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
Post-error slowing has long been considered a sign of healthy error detection and an important component of cognitive function. However, the neuropharmacological processes underlying post-error slowing are poorly understood.
This study investigated the effect of the dopamine agonist d-amphetamine on post-error slowing and secondarily, the potential mediator of drug-induced euphoria and potential moderators of personality and baseline task performance.
Healthy male and female participants (N = 110) completed four study sessions, at which d-amphetamine (placebo 5, 10, 20 mg) was administered under double-blind, counter-balanced conditions. At each session, participants completed subjective drug effect assessments and a working memory task (N-back) to measure post-error slowing. They completed the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) during screening.
Amphetamine (20 mg) reduced post-error slowing, consistent with a dampened behavioral reactivity to errors. This was not related to drug-induced euphoria. Although higher scores on MPQ constraint were related to less post-error slowing under placebo conditions, neither personality nor baseline cognitive performance moderated the effects of amphetamine on post-error slowing.
The finding that amphetamine reduced post-error slowing supports the idea that dopamine plays a role in error stimulus processing. The finding is discussed in relation to an existing literature on the mechanisms and function of behavioral and electrophysiological indices of error sensitivity.
长期以来,错误后减速一直被认为是健康错误检测的标志,也是认知功能的重要组成部分。然而,错误后减速的神经药理学过程仍知之甚少。
本研究旨在探讨多巴胺激动剂 d-苯丙胺对错误后减速的影响,其次是药物引起的欣快感的潜在介导物,以及人格和基线任务表现的潜在调节剂。
健康的男性和女性参与者(N=110)完成了四个研究阶段,在这些阶段中,d-苯丙胺(安慰剂 5、10、20mg)在双盲、平衡条件下给药。在每个阶段,参与者完成主观药物效应评估和工作记忆任务(N-回),以测量错误后减速。他们在筛选期间完成了多维人格问卷(MPQ)。
安非他命(20mg)减少了错误后减速,这与对错误的行为反应减弱一致。这与药物引起的欣快感无关。尽管在安慰剂条件下,MPQ 约束的得分越高,错误后减速越少,但人格或基线认知表现都不能调节安非他命对错误后减速的影响。
安非他命减少错误后减速的发现支持了多巴胺在错误刺激处理中发挥作用的观点。该发现与关于行为和电生理错误敏感性指标的机制和功能的现有文献进行了讨论。