Emergency Department bCritical Care Department, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(4):214-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834af5bf.
Adult basic life support refresher training using voice feedback manikins has been shown to be feasible, but the superiority of this strategy over instructor-led (IL) refresher training for nurses in a hospital has not been studied in randomized trials.
To study if adult basic life support refresher training for nurses in a self-learning (SL) station using a voice feedback manikin is more effective than IL training.
A Resusci Anne Skills Station (Laerdal, Norway) was installed in a small room. A total of 235 nurses were randomized to SL or IL training. After 1 month and after 7 months, the proportions of nurses achieving a mean compression depth of 38-51 mm, a mean compression rate of 80-120/min, incomplete release of at least 5 mm and a mean ventilation volume of 400-1000 ml were compared between the SL and IL groups.
After 1 month, the proportion of nurses with any incomplete release of at least 5 mm was significantly lower in the SL group (23 of 54 nurses, 43%) compared with the IL group (33 of 47 nurses, 70%) (P=0.005). After 7 months, a lower proportion of nurses achieved a depth of 38-51 mm in the SL group (13 of 45 nurses, 29%) compared with the IL group (25 of 45 nurses, 56%) (P=0.01). For the other outcome parameters, no differences between SL and IL training could be demonstrated.
This randomized trial in a real-life setting showed that more nurses achieved adequate compression depth, 7 months after IL refresher training compared with training in a SL station. Further research is needed to improve the efficacy of this SL training strategy.
使用语音反馈模型进行成人基础生命支持复训已被证明是可行的,但在随机试验中,这种策略相对于医院护士的指导员指导(IL)复训是否具有优势尚未得到研究。
研究在自学(SL)站使用语音反馈模型对护士进行成人基础生命支持复训是否比 IL 培训更有效。
在一个小房间里安装了一个 Resusci Anne 技能站(挪威 Laerdal)。共有 235 名护士被随机分配到 SL 或 IL 培训组。在 1 个月和 7 个月后,比较 SL 和 IL 组中护士达到平均按压深度 38-51mm、平均按压频率 80-120/min、不完全释放至少 5mm 和平均通气量 400-1000ml 的比例。
1 个月后,SL 组中任何不完全释放至少 5mm 的护士比例(54 名护士中的 23 名,43%)明显低于 IL 组(47 名护士中的 33 名,70%)(P=0.005)。7 个月后,SL 组中达到 38-51mm 深度的护士比例(45 名护士中的 13 名,29%)明显低于 IL 组(45 名护士中的 25 名,56%)(P=0.01)。对于其他结果参数,无法证明 SL 和 IL 培训之间存在差异。
这项在现实环境中进行的随机试验表明,与在 SL 站进行培训相比,IL 复训 7 个月后,更多的护士达到了足够的按压深度。需要进一步研究以提高这种 SL 培训策略的效果。