PhD Student, Division of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, SwedenAssociate Professor, Department of International Health, Umeå International School of Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, SwedenAssociate Professor, Division of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Health Expect. 2014 Feb;17(1):93-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00731.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
In 2008, the World Health Organization issued a callback to the principles of primary health care, which renewed interests in social participation in health. In Guatemala, social participation has been the main policy for the decentralization process since the late 1990s and the social development council scheme has been the main means for participation for the country's population since 2002.
The aim of this study was to explore the process of social participation at a municipal-level health commission in the municipality of Palencia, Guatemala.
Analysis of legal and policy documents and in-depth interviews with institutional and community-level stakeholders of the commission.
The lack of clear guidelines and regulations means that the stakeholders own motivations, agendas and power resources play an important part in defining the roles of the participants. Institutional stakeholders have the human and financial power to make policies. The community-level stakeholders are token participants with little power resources. Their main role is to identify the needs of their communities and seek help from the authorities. Satisfaction and the perceived benefits that the stakeholders obtain from the process play an important part in maintaining the commission's dynamic, which is unlikely to change unless the stakeholders perceive that the benefit they obtain does not outweigh the effort their role entails.
Without more uniformed mechanisms and incentives for municipalities to work towards the national goal of equitable involvement in the development process, the achievements will be fragmented and will depend on the individual stakeholder's good will.
2008 年,世界卫生组织对初级卫生保健原则发出了呼吁,这重新引发了人们对社会参与健康的兴趣。在危地马拉,自 20 世纪 90 年代末以来,社会参与一直是权力下放进程的主要政策,自 2002 年以来,社会发展理事会计划一直是该国人口参与的主要手段。
本研究旨在探讨危地马拉帕伦西亚市市级卫生委员会的社会参与过程。
对法律和政策文件进行分析,并对委员会的机构和社区利益相关者进行深入访谈。
缺乏明确的准则和条例意味着利益相关者自身的动机、议程和权力资源在确定参与者的角色方面起着重要作用。机构利益相关者拥有制定政策的人力和财力。社区一级的利益相关者是象征性的参与者,权力资源有限。他们的主要作用是确定社区的需求,并向当局寻求帮助。利益相关者从该过程中获得的满意度和感知到的收益在维持委员会的活力方面起着重要作用,除非利益相关者认为他们获得的收益不超过他们所承担角色的努力,否则委员会的活力不太可能改变。
如果没有更统一的机制和激励措施来促使市政府努力实现国家在公平参与发展进程方面的目标,那么成就将是零散的,这将取决于个别利益相关者的良好意愿。