Collins C, Araujo J, Barbosa J
International Division, Nuffield Institute for Health, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK.
Health Policy. 2000 Jun;52(2):113-27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00069-5.
The health sector in Brazil has undergone important changes, particularly with the development of the Unified Health System (SUS). Decentralisation is an important principle of SUS and advances have been made in transferring responsibilities and resources to the local government units, known as municipios. This article describes the changes introduced, focusing on the system of municipio classification and the funding mechanisms introduced through the basic operating rule (BOR) of 1996. The paper then moves on to analysing three key issues of decentralisation in Brazil that are related to the policy process, the system of decentralisation and the output of decentralisation. Firstly, the formal process by which decisions on health sector reform are made is discussed with particular attention being paid to the negotiated and relatively open policy space. Secondly, the role of the states is discussed within the decentralised system. Thirdly, the impact of decentralisation on equity is discussed with particular reference to the resourcing of the Municipal Health Funds. The article concludes by emphasising the political nature of health sector decentralisation and the need to develop the conditions for effectiveness in decentralisation programmes.
巴西的卫生部门经历了重大变革,尤其是随着统一卫生系统(SUS)的发展。分权是SUS的一项重要原则,在将责任和资源转移到称为市的地方政府单位方面已取得进展。本文描述了所引入的变革,重点关注市的分类体系以及通过1996年基本运作规则(BOR)引入的资金机制。接着,本文转而分析巴西分权的三个关键问题,这些问题与政策过程、分权体系和分权产出有关。首先,讨论了卫生部门改革决策的正式过程,特别关注协商而成且相对开放的政策空间。其次,探讨了州在分权体系中的作用。第三,特别提及市卫生基金的资源配置,讨论了分权对公平性的影响。文章最后强调了卫生部门分权的政治性质以及为分权计划的有效性创造条件的必要性。