Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Circ Heart Fail. 2011 Nov;4(6):685-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963256. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
Worsening renal function (WRF) in the setting of heart failure has been associated with increased mortality. However, it is unclear if this decreased survival is a direct result of the reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or if the mechanism underlying the deterioration in GFR is driving prognosis. Given that WRF in the setting of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) initiation is likely mechanistically distinct from spontaneously occurring WRF, we investigated the relative early WRF-associated mortality rates in subjects randomized to ACE-I or placebo.
Subjects in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) limited data set (n=6337) were studied. The interaction between early WRF (decrease in estimated GFR ≥20% at 14 days), randomization to enalapril, and mortality was the primary end point. In the overall population, early WRF was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P=0.037). When analysis was restricted to the placebo group, this association strengthened (adjusted HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; P=0.004). However, in the enalapril group, early WRF had no adverse prognostic significance (adjusted HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8-1.3; P=1.0; P=0.09 for the interaction). In patients who continued to receive study drug despite early WRF, a survival advantage remained with enalapril therapy (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; P=0.018).
These data support the notion that the mechanism underlying WRF is important in determining its prognostic significance. Specifically, early WRF in the setting of ACE-I initiation appears to represent a benign event that is not associated with a loss of benefit from continued ACE-I therapy.
心力衰竭患者肾功能恶化(WRF)与死亡率增加有关。然而,尚不清楚这种生存率的降低是否是肾小球滤过率(GFR)降低的直接结果,或者导致 GFR 恶化的机制是否在驱动预后。鉴于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)起始时的 WRF 很可能在机制上与自发发生的 WRF 不同,我们研究了随机分配至 ACE-I 或安慰剂的患者中相对早期 WRF 相关死亡率。
研究了 Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction(SOLVD)有限数据集(n=6337)中的受试者。早期 WRF(14 天内估计 GFR 下降≥20%)、随机分组至依那普利与死亡率之间的相互作用是主要终点。在总体人群中,早期 WRF 与死亡率增加相关(校正后的危险比[HR],1.2;95%CI,1.0-1.4;P=0.037)。当分析仅限于安慰剂组时,这种相关性增强(校正 HR,1.4;95%CI,1.1-1.8;P=0.004)。然而,在依那普利组中,早期 WRF 无不良预后意义(校正 HR,1.0;95%CI,0.8-1.3;P=1.0;P=0.09 用于交互作用)。在尽管发生早期 WRF 但仍继续接受研究药物的患者中,依那普利治疗仍存在生存优势(校正 HR,0.66;95%CI,0.5-0.9;P=0.018)。
这些数据支持这样一种观点,即 WRF 背后的机制在确定其预后意义方面很重要。具体而言,ACE-I 起始时的早期 WRF 似乎代表一种良性事件,与继续接受 ACE-I 治疗的获益丧失无关。