Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Station 19, AI 2101, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):539-47. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2852-3. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Following the theoretical notion that tools often extend one's body, in the present study, we investigated whether imitation of hand or tool actions is modulated by effector-specific information. Subjects performed grasping actions toward an object with either a handheld tool or their right hand. Actions were initiated in response to pictures representing a grip at an object that could be congruent or incongruent with the required action (grip-type congruency). Importantly, actions could be cued by means of a tool cue, a hand cue, and a symbolic cue (effector-type congruency). For both hand and tool actions, an action congruency effect was observed, reflected in faster reaction times if the observed grip type was congruent with the required movement. However, neither hand actions nor tool actions were differentially affected by the effector represented in the picture (i.e., when performing a tool action, the action congruency effect was similar for tool cues and hand cues). This finding suggests that imitation of hand and tool actions is effector-independent and thereby supports generalist rather than specialist theories of imitation.
根据工具通常会延伸人体的理论概念,本研究旨在探究模仿手部或工具动作是否受到效应器特异性信息的调节。研究对象使用手持工具或右手对物体进行抓握动作。动作是在响应代表物体握持的图片后开始的,这些图片可以与所需的动作(握持类型一致性)一致或不一致。重要的是,动作可以通过工具提示、手部提示和符号提示(效应器类型一致性)来提示。对于手部和工具动作,都观察到了动作一致性效应,如果观察到的握持类型与所需的运动一致,则反应时间更快。然而,手部动作和工具动作都不受图片中代表的效应器的影响(即,当执行工具动作时,工具提示和手部提示的动作一致性效应相似)。这一发现表明,对手部和工具动作的模仿是不依赖于效应器的,因此支持模仿的通用理论而不是专业理论。