Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Sep-Oct;43(5):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.09.009.
To evaluate the efficacy of computer-tailored nutrition education with objective outcome measures.
A 3-group randomized, controlled trial with posttests at 1 and 6 months post-intervention.
Worksites and 2 neighborhoods in the urban area of Rotterdam.
A convenience sample of healthy Dutch adults (n = 442).
A computer-tailored intervention delivered on CD-ROM; a computer-tailored intervention delivered in print; and a generic information condition.
Blood lipids (total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triacylglycerol) were measured by analyzing venous blood samples.
Linear mixed model procedure.
There were no significant differences among the 3 intervention groups in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triacylglycerol.
Contrary to results based on self-report data, no effects of the computer-tailored interventions were found based on objective outcomes. This contradiction calls for a critical reflection on the use of computer-tailored nutrition education interventions and the need to improve those interventions. Furthermore, this study indicates that feasible methods are needed to objectively assess the impact of computer-tailored nutrition education interventions in free-living subjects.
评估基于客观结果测量的计算机定制营养教育的效果。
3 组随机对照试验,干预后 1 个月和 6 个月进行随访。
鹿特丹市区的工作场所和 2 个社区。
健康的荷兰成年人的便利样本(n=442)。
基于 CD-ROM 的计算机定制干预;基于打印的计算机定制干预;以及通用信息条件。
血脂(总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和三酰甘油)通过分析静脉血样进行测量。
线性混合模型程序。
3 种干预组之间的总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和三酰甘油均无显著差异。
与基于自我报告数据的结果相反,基于客观结果并未发现计算机定制干预的效果。这种矛盾呼吁对计算机定制营养教育干预的使用进行批判性反思,并需要改进这些干预措施。此外,本研究表明,需要可行的方法来客观评估计算机定制营养教育干预对自由生活人群的影响。