Gentilini M, Danis M, Mouchet J
Département de Parasitologie, Médecine Tropicale et Santé Publique, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris.
Bull Acad Natl Med. 1990 Jan;174(1):147-58; discussion 158-60.
Two billion of persons live in regions where endemic malaria prevails or has reappeared. An estimated on hundred million infected individuals per year have been reported around the world. In front of this alarming situation, the diversity and even the incoherence of the currently proposed prophylactic regimens confuses the therapists and renders difficult the adoption of an efficacious strategy. The extension and gravity of drug resistance of P. falciparum and the withdrawal of anti-vectorial campaign constitute two reasons for the present recrudescence of malaria. The preventive strategies in 1990 are based on: rehabilitation of anti-vectorial campaign particularly against nocturnal mosquito bites, applicable to all, everywhere and at all times, by the means of individual and collective measures and mostly by impregnated nets; chemoprophylaxis for which two situations should be distinguished: the non immune traveler leaving for a short period (inferior or equal to 3 months) to an endemic area: individuals living permanently or for long periods in tropical regions. Prevention for short stays In low risk transmission zone (North Africa, Mexico, large cities of South East Asia) whatever the duration, suppression of chemoprophylaxis is acceptable. In high risk transmission zone, three strategies exist according to the intensity and frequency of drug resistance: zone 1 (P. vivax or drug sensitive P. falciparum): chloroquine at a dose of 100 mg/day for adults (1.5 mg/kg/day for children) 6 days out of 7, from the day of departure trough the whole stay and for one month after the return, is still efficacious; zone 2 (moderate frequency of drug resistance): protection is again ensured by chloroquine only, as in zone 1, or better than that by the association of chloroquine 300 mg once a week and proguanil 200 mg/day (3 mg/kg/day for children). The side effects of mefloquine and the risk of generation drug resistance argue against its general use in this zone particularly in West Africa. In one year, we have already observed three chemoprophylactic failures with mefloquine in individuals returning from this region; zone 3 (high frequency of drug resistance and multiresistance): mefloquine, if well tolerated is justified in weekly intake. In case of contraindications or intolerance to mefloquine, which are becoming more frequent, no substitution for that chemoprophylactic regimen is presently available. In view of these facts, indications, contraindications and posologies of mefloquine should be reviewed to better profit from the remarkable characteristics of this antimalarial. Mefloquine should only be prescribed (excluding curative treatment) for chemoprophylaxis of short stays in zone 3. Some contraindications of this drug should be maintained (pregnant women) or made relative (treatment with B-blockers and in the absence of pediatric studies, children weighing less than 15 kg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
二十亿人生活在疟疾流行或再度出现的地区。据报道,全球每年估计有一亿人感染疟疾。面对这一令人担忧的情况,目前所提出的预防方案的多样性甚至不一致性使治疗师感到困惑,并且难以采用有效的策略。恶性疟原虫耐药性的扩大和严重程度以及抗媒介传播运动的撤销是目前疟疾复发的两个原因。1990年的预防策略基于:恢复抗媒介传播运动,特别是针对夜间蚊虫叮咬,通过个人和集体措施,主要是使用浸药蚊帐,在任何地方、任何时间对所有人都适用;化学预防,应区分两种情况:非免疫旅行者短期(少于或等于3个月)前往流行地区;长期或永久居住在热带地区的个人。短期停留的预防在低风险传播地区(北非、墨西哥、东南亚大城市),无论停留时间长短,均可停止化学预防。在高风险传播地区,根据耐药性的强度和频率有三种策略:1区(间日疟或对药物敏感的恶性疟):成人每天服用100毫克氯喹(儿童每天1.5毫克/千克),每周服用6天,从出发日起至整个停留期间以及返回后一个月,仍然有效;2区(耐药性中等频率):与1区一样,仅用氯喹即可确保防护,或者用氯喹300毫克每周一次和氯胍200毫克/天(儿童3毫克/千克/天)联合使用效果更好。甲氟喹的副作用和产生耐药性的风险使其不宜在该地区普遍使用,特别是在西非。在一年内,我们已经观察到从该地区返回的人员中有三例使用甲氟喹预防失败的情况;3区(耐药性高频率和多重耐药):如果耐受性良好,甲氟喹每周服用是合理的。鉴于甲氟喹的禁忌证或不耐受情况越来越频繁,目前尚无替代的化学预防方案。鉴于这些事实,应重新审视甲氟喹的适应证、禁忌证和剂量,以便更好地利用这种抗疟药的显著特性。甲氟喹仅应(不包括治疗性治疗)用于3区短期停留的化学预防。该药物的一些禁忌证应保留(孕妇)或放宽(使用β受体阻滞剂治疗以及在缺乏儿科研究的情况下,体重小于15千克的儿童)。(摘要截取自400字)