Suppr超能文献

[氯喹高抗性地区的单纯性疟疾发作。2. 首选治疗方案评估]

[Uncomplicated malaria attack in an area with high chloroquine resistance. 2. Evaluation of first-choice therapeutic scheme].

作者信息

Hengy C, Eberlé F, Arrive A, Kouka-Bemba D, Gazin P, Jambou R

机构信息

Centre Pasteur.

出版信息

Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1990;83(1):53-60.

PMID:2190705
Abstract

The authors evaluate the comparative efficiency of chloroquine and amodiaquine (35 mg/kg during 3 days) for uncomplicated malaria treatment in an area with high chemoresistance level. 236 patients with malaria were examined and treated. 38% of them previously used antimalarials. The increase dosage in comparison with the WHO recommendations (25 mg/kg), lead to no advantages for chloroquine treatment (50% failure), in contrast with amodiaquine (4% failure). Therefore amodiaquine might be preferred in the health field unit for uncomplicated malaria.

摘要

作者评估了氯喹和氨酚喹(35毫克/千克,疗程3天)在一个耐药性水平高的地区治疗非复杂性疟疾的相对疗效。对236例疟疾患者进行了检查和治疗。其中38%的患者此前使用过抗疟药。与世界卫生组织的建议剂量(25毫克/千克)相比增加剂量,氯喹治疗无优势(50%治疗失败),而氨酚喹(4%治疗失败)。因此,在卫生领域单位治疗非复杂性疟疾时,氨酚喹可能更受青睐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验