Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Explore (NY). 2011 Sep-Oct;7(5):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2011.06.002.
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are frequently used to assess therapeutic efficacy and effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Although CAM investigators are increasingly making use of valid, self-report instruments to assess patient-relevant outcomes, the sheer number of available instruments poses challenges. Two of the more pressing issues are discussed: the lack of guidance for selecting measures and the limited attention paid to the clinical meaningfulness of PRO results. Solutions are offered that may support selection and standardization of outcome measures for future CAM studies. This includes testing of tools from the National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Increased standardization of outcome measurement in CAM studies will allow for more cross-study comparisons and facilitate the statistical pooling of results, ultimately leading to a more informative evidence base.
患者报告的结果(PRO)测量常用于评估补充和替代医学(CAM)的治疗效果和疗效。尽管 CAM 研究人员越来越多地使用有效、自我报告的工具来评估与患者相关的结果,但可用工具的数量众多带来了挑战。本文讨论了两个更为紧迫的问题:缺乏选择措施的指导和对 PRO 结果临床意义的关注有限。本文提供了一些解决方案,可能有助于未来 CAM 研究中选择和标准化结果测量。这包括对美国国立卫生研究院患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)工具的测试。CAM 研究中结果测量的标准化程度提高将允许进行更多的跨研究比较,并促进结果的统计学汇总,最终为更具信息量的证据基础提供支持。