University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(3):345-51.
Breaches of ethics are prevalent in biomedical publishing. Kapoor and colleagues identify several of the practical and ethics dilemmas that they have encountered in editing The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Biomedical publishing ethics is continually evolving, with discrepant practice among different publications. Publication ethics apply to authors, editors, peer reviewers, journal publishers or owners, and their respective institutions. The Journal and the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) would be enhanced by better formulating and elucidating its authorship requirements and relevant disclosures, both in print and online. The Journal could then serve as a leader in this arena.
生物医学出版界普遍存在违反职业道德的行为。Kapoor 及其同事在编辑《美国精神病学与法律学会杂志》时,发现了一些实际的和道德上的困境。生物医学出版道德规范在不断发展,不同出版物之间的实践存在差异。出版道德规范适用于作者、编辑、同行评审员、期刊出版商或所有者及其各自的机构。通过更好地制定和阐明其作者身份要求和相关披露,无论是在印刷品还是在线上,该杂志和美国精神病学与法律学会(AAPL)都会得到加强。该杂志随后可以在这一领域发挥领导作用。