Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616 (VIJV1), 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Mar;38(2):231-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr129. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Rates of self-reported psychotic experiences (SRPEs) in general population samples are high; however the reliability against interview-based assessments and the clinical significance of false-positive (FP) ratings remain unclear.
The second Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2, a general population study.
Trained lay interviewers administered a structured interview assessing psychopathology and psychosocial characteristics in 6646 participants. Participants with at least one SRPE (N = 1084) were reassessed by clinical telephone interview.
Thirty-six percent of participants with SRPEs were confirmed by clinical interview as true positive (TP). SPREs not confirmed by clinical interview (FP group) generated less help-seeking behavior and occurred less frequently compared with TP experiences (TP group). However, compared with controls without psychotic experiences, the FP group more often displayed mood disorder (relative risk [RR] 1.7, 1.4-2.2), substance use disorder (RR 2.0, 1.6-2.6), cannabis use (RR 1.5, 1.2-1.9), higher levels of neuroticism (RR 1.8, 1.5-2.2), affective dysregulation, and social dysfunction. The FP group also experienced more sexual (RR 2.0, 1.5-2.8) and psychological childhood trauma (RR 2.1, 1.7-2.6) as well as peer victimization (RR 1.5, 1.2-2.0) and recent life events (RR 2.0, 1.6-2.4) than controls without psychotic experiences. Differences between the FP group and the TP group across these domains were much smaller and less conclusive.
SRPEs not confirmed by clinical interview may represent the softest expression of an extended psychosis phenotype that is phenotypically continuous with clinical psychosis but discontinuous in need for care.
一般人群样本中自我报告的精神病体验(SRPE)发生率较高;然而,与基于访谈的评估相比,其可靠性以及假阳性(FP)评分的临床意义仍不清楚。
第二次荷兰精神健康调查和发病率研究-2,一项一般人群研究。
经过培训的非专业访谈员对 6646 名参与者进行了一项评估精神病理学和心理社会特征的结构化访谈。至少有一项 SRPE 的参与者(N=1084)通过临床电话访谈进行了重新评估。
36%的有 SRPE 的参与者通过临床访谈被确认为真阳性(TP)。未经临床访谈确认的 SRPE(FP 组)比 TP 经历(TP 组)产生的寻求帮助行为更少,发生频率更低。然而,与没有精神病体验的对照组相比,FP 组更常出现心境障碍(相对风险 [RR] 1.7,1.4-2.2)、物质使用障碍(RR 2.0,1.6-2.6)、大麻使用(RR 1.5,1.2-1.9)、更高水平的神经质(RR 1.8,1.5-2.2)、情感失调和社会功能障碍。FP 组还经历了更多的性(RR 2.0,1.5-2.8)和心理儿童创伤(RR 2.1,1.7-2.6),以及同伴受害(RR 1.5,1.2-2.0)和近期生活事件(RR 2.0,1.6-2.4)比没有精神病体验的对照组更多。FP 组和 TP 组在这些领域之间的差异要小得多,也不那么明确。
未经临床访谈确认的 SRPE 可能代表扩展精神病表型的最轻微表现,该表型在表型上与临床精神病连续,但在需要护理方面不连续。