• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集合大小对大鼠身份和奇异性抽象概念学习的影响。

Effects of set size on identity and oddity abstract-concept learning in rats.

作者信息

Lazarowski Lucia, Goodman Adam, Galizio Mark, Bruce Katherine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S. College Rd., Wilmington, NC, 28403, USA.

Canine Performance Sciences, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, AL, USA.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01270-5. Epub 2019 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-019-01270-5
PMID:31147849
Abstract

Match (MTS) and non-match-to-sample (NMTS) procedures are used to assess concepts of identity and oddity across species and are measured by transfer performance to novel stimuli. The number of exemplars used in training (set size) has been shown to affect learning with evidence of larger set sizes promoting concept learning in several species. The present study explored the effects of set size and procedure on concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli. Concept learning was assessed for 20 rats via transfer tests consisting of novel stimuli after rats were initially trained to either MTS or NMTS with two or ten stimuli as exemplars. No difference was found in acquisition or transfer between MTS and NMTS, but rats trained with ten stimuli performed better on novel transfer tests than rats trained with two. When set size was expanded for rats originally trained with two stimuli and rats were re-tested with ten novel stimuli, performance showed full transfer demonstrating that training with multiple exemplars facilitates concept learning.

摘要

匹配(MTS)和非匹配样本(NMTS)程序用于评估跨物种的同一性和奇异性概念,并通过对新刺激的迁移表现来衡量。研究表明,训练中使用的范例数量(集合大小)会影响学习,有证据表明更大的集合大小会促进几个物种的概念学习。本研究使用嗅觉刺激探究了集合大小和程序对大鼠概念学习的影响。在大鼠最初接受以两个或十个刺激作为范例的MTS或NMTS训练后,通过由新刺激组成的迁移测试对20只大鼠的概念学习进行评估。在MTS和NMTS之间的习得或迁移方面未发现差异,但接受十个刺激训练的大鼠在新的迁移测试中的表现优于接受两个刺激训练的大鼠。当最初接受两个刺激训练的大鼠的集合大小扩大,并用十个新刺激重新测试时,表现出完全迁移,这表明使用多个范例进行训练有助于概念学习。

相似文献

1
Effects of set size on identity and oddity abstract-concept learning in rats.集合大小对大鼠身份和奇异性抽象概念学习的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01270-5. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.鸽子的奇特偏好效应与差异概念
Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):320-328. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0.
3
Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.大鼠连续气味匹配与非匹配样本任务:一种反转设计。
Behav Processes. 2018 Oct;155:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons.鸽子对差异的抽象概念学习。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jul;18(4):831-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0849-1. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
5
Concurrent learning of multiple oddity discrimination in rats.大鼠同时学习多种异常辨别任务。
Behav Processes. 2017 Jul;140:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.利用嗅觉刺激进行大鼠的匹配和非匹配样本概念学习。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):139-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-139.
7
Identity concept learning in matching-to-sample tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).丛猴(僧帽猴属)在匹配样本任务中的身份概念学习。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Nov;13(6):835-48. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0332-y. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
8
Concept learning set-size functions for Clark's nutcrackers.克拉克胡桃夹子的概念学习集大小函数
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):76-84. doi: 10.1002/jeab.174. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
9
Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons.鸽子的抽象概念学习匹配样本实验
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):178-84. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.178.
10
Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.灵长类动物和鸟类中相同/不同概念学习的机制。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):234-54. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Rats can distinguish (and generalize) among two white wine varieties.大鼠能够区分(并归纳)两种白葡萄酒品种。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Feb 21;28(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01937-2.
2
Visuo-spatial compound stimuli discrimination with (Gryllus pennsylvanicus) in two-choices rewarding learning tasks.在两种奖励学习任务中使用(蟋蟀)进行视空间复合刺激辨别。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 12;27(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01903-4.
3
Generalized, cross-modal, and incrementing non-matching-to-sample in rats.大鼠的广义、跨模态和递增式非匹配样本任务
Learn Behav. 2023 Mar;51(1):88-107. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00571-7. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
4
Incrementing non-matching- but not matching-to-sample is rapidly learned in an automated version of the odor span task.在气味跨度任务的自动化版本中,递增不匹配但不匹配样本的任务可以快速学习。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Oct;25(5):1259-1270. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01608-6. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
Emergence of abstract rules in the primate brain.灵长类大脑中抽象规则的出现。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020 Nov;21(11):595-610. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0364-5. Epub 2020 Sep 14.