Grant Don, Trautner Mary Nell, Downey Liam, Thiebaud Lisa
University of Arizona.
Am Sociol Rev. 2010 Aug;75(4):479-504. doi: 10.1177/0003122410374822.
Environmental justice scholars have suggested that because chemical plants and other hazardous facilities emit more pollutants where they face the least resistance, disadvantaged communities face a special health risk. In trying to determine whether race or income has the bigger impact on a neighborhood's exposure to pollution, however, scholars tend to overlook the facilities themselves and the effect of their characteristics on emissions. In particular, how do the characteristics of facilities and their surrounding communities jointly shape pollution outcomes? We propose a new line of environmental justice research that focuses on facilities and how their features combine with communities' features to create dangerous emissions. Using novel fuzzy-set analysis techniques and the EPA's newly developed Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators, we test the influence of facility and community factors on chemical plants' health-threatening emissions. Contrary to the idea that community characteristics have singular, linear effects, findings show that facility and community factors combine in a variety of ways to produce risky emissions. We speculate that as chemical firms experiment with different ways of producing goods and externalizing pollution costs, new "recipes of risk" are likely to emerge. The question, then, will no longer be whether race or income matters most, but in which of these recipes do they matter and how.
环境正义学者指出,由于化工厂和其他危险设施在阻力最小的地方排放更多污染物,弱势社区面临特殊的健康风险。然而,在试图确定种族或收入对社区接触污染的影响更大时,学者们往往忽视了这些设施本身以及它们的特征对排放的影响。特别是,设施的特征及其周边社区是如何共同塑造污染结果的?我们提出了一条新的环境正义研究路线,重点关注设施以及它们的特征如何与社区特征相结合以产生危险排放。我们使用新颖的模糊集分析技术和美国环境保护局新开发的风险筛选环境指标,测试设施和社区因素对化工厂威胁健康排放的影响。与社区特征具有单一、线性影响的观点相反,研究结果表明,设施和社区因素以多种方式结合以产生风险排放。我们推测,随着化工公司尝试不同的生产商品和外部化污染成本的方式,新的“风险配方”可能会出现。那么问题将不再是种族或收入哪个最重要,而是在这些配方中它们在哪些方面重要以及如何重要。