Stony Brook University Medical Center, 100 Nicolls Road, HSC-17, Room 064, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;4(5):283-94. doi: 10.1177/1756283X11412240.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become increasingly important in the practice of gastroenterology and endoscopy, and the training of future gastroenterology physicians. The objectives were to assess the attitudes/opinions of gastroenterology specialists towards EBM, and evaluate possible gaps in education for certain EBM-related concepts.
An internet-based survey was emailed to 4073 gastroenterology specialists. The main outcome measurements were physicians' endorsement of EBM, impact of EBM on clinical practice, utilization of EBM-specific resources, self-assessed understanding of EBM concepts (EBM familiarity score), and actual knowledge of EBM concepts (EBM competency score).
A total of 337 gastroenterology specialists participated. On a sale of 1-10, there was widespread agreement that EBM improves patient care (median score = 9, interquartile range (IQR) = 7-10), and physicians should be familiar with techniques for critical appraisal of studies (median = 9, IQR = 8-10). Most (64.0%) utilized the EBM-related resource UpToDate™ regularly, as opposed to PubMed™ (47.1%) or Clinical Evidence™ (5.4%). The mean EBM familiarity score was 3.4 ± 0.6 on a scale of 1-4. Out of a maximum 49 points, the mean EBM competency score was 35 ± 4.9. There was poor concordance among EBM familiarity and competency scores (r = 0.161; p = 0.005). Academic practice (p < 0.001), research/teaching (p < 0.001), advanced degree (p = 0.012), and recent EBM training (p = 0.001) were all associated with improved EBM competency.
The attitudes and opinions of EBM are extremely favorable among gastroenterology physicians. Although gastroenterology physicians report familiarity with most EBM-related concepts, there is poor correlation with their actual knowledge of EBM. Further educational initiatives should be undertaken to address methods in which EBM skills are reinforced among all gastroenterology practitioners.
循证医学(EBM)在胃肠病学和内镜检查实践以及未来胃肠病医师的培训中变得越来越重要。目的是评估胃肠病学专家对 EBM 的态度/看法,并评估某些与 EBM 相关概念的教育差距。
通过电子邮件向 4073 名胃肠病学专家发送了一项基于互联网的调查。主要结果测量是医生对 EBM 的认可、EBM 对临床实践的影响、EBM 特定资源的利用、对 EBM 概念的自我评估理解(EBM 熟悉度评分)以及 EBM 概念的实际知识(EBM 能力评分)。
共有 337 名胃肠病学专家参与。在 1-10 的评分中,广泛认为 EBM 改善了患者的护理(中位数评分为 9,四分位距(IQR)= 7-10),并且医生应该熟悉对研究进行批判性评估的技术(中位数= 9,IQR= 8-10)。大多数(64.0%)经常使用与 EBM 相关的资源 UpToDate™,而不是 PubMed™(47.1%)或 Clinical Evidence™(5.4%)。在 1-4 的量表上,EBM 熟悉度的平均得分为 3.4±0.6。在 49 分的最高总分中,EBM 能力的平均得分为 35±4.9。EBM 熟悉度和能力评分之间的一致性较差(r=0.161;p=0.005)。学术实践(p<0.001)、研究/教学(p<0.001)、高级学位(p=0.012)和最近的 EBM 培训(p=0.001)均与 EBM 能力的提高相关。
胃肠病学医生对 EBM 的态度和看法非常有利。尽管胃肠病学医生报告说他们熟悉大多数与 EBM 相关的概念,但与他们对 EBM 的实际知识之间相关性较差。应采取进一步的教育举措,以解决在所有胃肠病学从业人员中加强 EBM 技能的方法。