Department of Orthopedics, Yildirim Beyazit University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Int Orthop. 2012 Mar;36(3):595-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1356-x. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
The relationship between glenoid version angle and rotator cuff pathology has been described. However, the effect of glenoid version angle on rotator cuff pathology is still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an impact of glenoid version angle on rotator cuff pathology.
All shoulder MRI examinations performed in the study centres between August 2008 and August 2009 were evaluated retrospectively. Shoulder MRI examinations having rotator cuff pathology such as trauma, degeneration, and acromion type 2-3-4 reported in previous studies were excluded from the study. Sixty-two shoulder MRIs with rotator cuff pathology having type 1 acromion morphology and 60 shoulder exams without rotator cuff pathology were included in the study. Glenoid version angle was calculated in axial images. Rotator cuff was evaluated in fat-suppressed T2-weighted and proton density-weighted images.
The mean values for glenoid version angle were 2.41° and 0.61° in the control and the study groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, 26.6% and 33.8% of the glenoids were retroverted and 73.4% and 66.2% were anteverted in the control and the study groups, respectively (all p > 0.05).
This study demonstrated no significant relationship between glenoid version angle and rotator cuff pathology. Therefore, the pathologies that can be related to the cuff itself should be investigated if the pathology cannot be explained by an extrinsic cause in subjects with rotator cuff pathology.
已经描述了肩盂版本角与肩袖病理之间的关系。然而,肩盂版本角对肩袖病理的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨肩盂版本角是否对肩袖病理有影响。
回顾性评估了 2008 年 8 月至 2009 年 8 月期间在研究中心进行的所有肩部 MRI 检查。先前研究中报道的肩袖病变(如创伤、退变和肩峰 2-3-4 型)的肩部 MRI 检查排除在研究之外。本研究纳入了 62 例肩袖病变(肩峰 1 型)的肩部 MRI 检查和 60 例无肩袖病变的肩部 MRI 检查。在轴位图像中计算肩盂版本角。在脂肪抑制 T2 加权和质子密度加权图像中评估肩袖。
对照组和研究组的肩盂版本角平均值分别为 2.41°和 0.61°。两组之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。此外,对照组和研究组中分别有 26.6%和 33.8%的肩盂后倾,73.4%和 66.2%的肩盂前倾(均 p>0.05)。
本研究表明肩盂版本角与肩袖病理之间无显著关系。因此,如果肩袖病变不能用外在原因解释,在有肩袖病变的患者中,应该调查与肩袖本身有关的病变。