Suppr超能文献

对教师发展的批判性评价和建议。

A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, 94143-0622, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):122. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756122.

Abstract

The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes.The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.

摘要

2009-2010 年美国药学院协会(AACP)理事会教员事务委员会审查了评估教职员工终身教职和晋升发展的范围和结果的已发表文献。通过 PubMed 搜索、药学教育期刊的回顾以及主要医疗保健专业学术组织的立场文件的识别,确定了相关文章。虽然一些医疗保健专业人员描述了旨在加强教员发展的计划,但相对而言,针对药学的具体内容很少,并且没有一个医疗保健专业人员对各种教员发展计划对相关结果的影响进行了充分评估。出版信息的匮乏强烈表明,学院和药学院校缺乏以结果为导向的教员发展计划。需要朝着教员发展计划的制定和学术评估迈出实质性的步伐。随着这些计划的制定和评估,评估必须涵盖所有教员小组,包括终身教职和非终身教职教员、志愿教员、女性和代表性不足的少数群体。本文提出了 AACP、学院和学校以及系级别的建议,旨在确保教员在获得终身教职和晋升方面取得成功。

相似文献

1
A critical appraisal of and recommendations for faculty development.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):122. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756122.
2
Report of the 2018-2019 Strategic Engagement Standing Committee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7597. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7597.
3
Report of the 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7595. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7595.
4
Scholarly Activity of Tenure-Track Faculty in US Departments of Pharmacy Practice.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe9150. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9150. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Qualitative Analysis of Pre and Postpromotion/Tenure Review Processes Employed by US Pharmacy Schools.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Jan;88(1):100590. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100590. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
8
Analysis of Teaching-Related Criteria Within Promotion and Tenure Documents from US Pharmacy Schools.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jul;87(7):100100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100100. Epub 2023 May 9.
9
Report of the 2023-2024 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Aug;88(8):100745. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100745. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
10
Analysis of Research and Scholarship Criteria Within Promotion and Tenure Documents of US Pharmacy Schools.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):7983. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7983. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

3
Requirements for improving social capital among faculty members of medical universities: A multicenter qualitative study.
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 13;6(2):e1113. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1113. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Ten Tips for Pharmacy Faculty Members for Successfully Navigating Promotion and Tenure.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Jan;85(1):8414. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8414. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
5
Long-term evaluation of a train-the-trainer workshop for pharmacy faculty using the RE-AIM framework.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1562-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Facilitating Advancement of Clinical-Track Pharmacy Faculty Members.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May;84(5):7910. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910.
7
Self-Help for the Pharmacy Educator.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 May;82(4):7086. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7086.
9
Pharmacy Educator Motives to Pursue Pedagogical Knowledge.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Oct 25;80(8):132. doi: 10.5688/ajpe808132.

本文引用的文献

1
AAIM Report on Master Teachers and Clinician Educators Part 2: faculty development and training.
Am J Med. 2010 Sep;123(9):869-872.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.05.014.
2
AAIM Report on Master Teachers and Clinician Educators Part 1: needs and skills.
Am J Med. 2010 Aug;123(8):769-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.05.001.
4
Recommended education for pharmacists as competitive clinical scientists.
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Feb;29(2):236-44. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.2.236.
6
ACCP position statement: Clinical faculty development.
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Jan;29(1):124-6. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.1.124.
8
Faculty awards at US colleges and schools of pharmacy.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Aug 15;72(4):85. doi: 10.5688/aj720485.
9
Facilitated peer mentorship: a pilot program for academic advancement of female medical faculty.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Jul-Aug;17(6):1009-15. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0647.
10
Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow.
Med Teach. 2008;30(6):555-84. doi: 10.1080/01421590802109834.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验