School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, 94143-0622, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):122. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756122.
The 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes.The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.
2009-2010 年美国药学院协会(AACP)理事会教员事务委员会审查了评估教职员工终身教职和晋升发展的范围和结果的已发表文献。通过 PubMed 搜索、药学教育期刊的回顾以及主要医疗保健专业学术组织的立场文件的识别,确定了相关文章。虽然一些医疗保健专业人员描述了旨在加强教员发展的计划,但相对而言,针对药学的具体内容很少,并且没有一个医疗保健专业人员对各种教员发展计划对相关结果的影响进行了充分评估。出版信息的匮乏强烈表明,学院和药学院校缺乏以结果为导向的教员发展计划。需要朝着教员发展计划的制定和学术评估迈出实质性的步伐。随着这些计划的制定和评估,评估必须涵盖所有教员小组,包括终身教职和非终身教职教员、志愿教员、女性和代表性不足的少数群体。本文提出了 AACP、学院和学校以及系级别的建议,旨在确保教员在获得终身教职和晋升方面取得成功。