Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Arizona R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Oct;88(10):101270. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101270. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
There are unique challenges associated with the evaluation of faculty in pharmacy departments or divisions that have a mix of nontenure-track and tenure-track faculty members. Such evaluations are intended to provide feedback on performance and personal growth but have the potential to demotivate faculty and add to existing stress if improperly performed. The purpose of this commentary is to suggest best practices for department chairs involved in performing evaluations of faculty in pharmacy departments or divisions that have a mix of nontenure-track and tenure-track faculty members. The paper is intended to help ensure these evaluations not only capture the quality and quantity of each faculty member's full range of activities and responsibilities but also are conducted in a supportive and constructive fashion. This commentary is targeted at new department chairs, new faculty members unfamiliar with academic evaluation processes, and departments contemplating changes in their existing evaluation procedures.
对于同时拥有非终身教职和终身教职教职员工的药学系或药学部的教职员工进行评估时,存在一些独特的挑战。这些评估旨在提供绩效和个人成长方面的反馈,但如果执行不当,可能会使教职员工失去动力并增加他们的现有压力。本文的目的是为参与对同时拥有非终身教职和终身教职教职员工的药学系或药学部的教职员工进行评估的系主任提供最佳实践建议。本文旨在帮助确保这些评估不仅能捕捉到每位教职员工各项活动和职责的质量和数量,而且还能以支持和建设性的方式进行。本文针对的是新任系主任、不熟悉学术评估流程的新教职员工以及正在考虑改变现有评估程序的系。