University of Tromsø, Tromsø Norway.
Health Informatics J. 2011 Sep;17(3):161-72. doi: 10.1177/1460458211409716.
Whereas in most sectors, technology has taken over trivial and labour consuming tasks, this transformation has been delayed in the healthcare sector. Although appropriate technology is available, there is general resistance to substituting 'warm' hands with 'cold' technology. In the future, this may change as the number of elderly people increases relative to the people in the work force. In combination with an increasing demand for healthcare services, there are calls for efforts to increase productivity in the sector. Based on experience data from previous studies on information and communication technology efforts in the healthcare sector, we quantitatively assess the use of smart house technology and video visits in home care. Having identified healthcare providers, hospitals and relatives as the main affected groups, we show that smart house technology is cost-effective, even if only relatives gain from it. Video visits, which have higher implementation costs, demand effects on both relatives and health care providers in order to be a cost-effective tool in home care. As the analysis is purely quantitative, these results need to be complemented with qualitative effects and with more thorough discussions of the ethical, medical and legal aspects of the use of technology in home care.
与大多数行业不同,技术已经接管了琐碎且耗费人力的任务,但这一转变在医疗保健行业中被延迟了。尽管有合适的技术可用,但人们普遍抵制用“冰冷”的技术取代“温暖”的双手。随着老年人口相对于劳动力人口的增加,这种情况在未来可能会发生变化。再加上对医疗保健服务需求的增加,人们呼吁努力提高该行业的生产力。基于以前在医疗保健领域的信息和通信技术工作的经验数据,我们对智能家居技术和家庭护理中的视频访问进行了定量评估。我们确定了医疗服务提供者、医院和亲属是主要的受影响群体,结果表明智能家居技术具有成本效益,即使只有亲属从中受益。视频访问具有更高的实施成本,为了成为家庭护理中具有成本效益的工具,它需要对亲属和医疗保健提供者产生影响。由于分析是纯粹定量的,因此需要用定性影响来补充这些结果,并更深入地讨论家庭护理中使用技术的伦理、医学和法律方面。