Levy S T, Inderbitzin L B
Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1990;38(2):371-91. doi: 10.1177/000306519003800205.
This paper examines the concept of the analytic surface as a starting point for the interpretive process in relation to the theory of psychoanalytic technique. The history of the concept of the analytic surface within psychoanalysis is reviewed. Four different conceptualizations of analytic surfaces are described (M.M. Gill, P. Gray, A. Kris, E.A. Schwaber). The advantages of a "surface" approach are explored in relation to clinical work, the teaching of psychoanalytic technique, and opportunities for research. Some criticisms of the concept are explored.
本文探讨了分析表面这一概念，将其作为与精神分析技术理论相关的解释过程的起点。回顾了精神分析中分析表面概念的历史。描述了分析表面的四种不同概念化（M.M.吉尔、P.格雷、A.克里斯、E.A.施瓦伯）。探讨了“表面”方法在临床工作、精神分析技术教学及研究机会方面的优势。也探讨了对该概念的一些批评。
