• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境障碍和社会支持对自杀预防守门人行为的影响。

The effects of situational obstacles and social support on suicide- prevention gatekeeper behaviors.

机构信息

Office of Suicide Prevention, Prevention Services Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246, USA.

出版信息

Crisis. 2011;32(5):264-71. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000090.

DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000090
PMID:21940253
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the effectiveness of suicide-prevention gatekeeper-training programs in improving knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices has been documented, their effects do not seem to be lasting.

AIMS

This study investigated situational obstacles at work that prevent suicide-prevention gatekeepers from engaging in suicide-prevention behavior and the role of social support in modifying the relationship between situational obstacles and suicide-prevention behaviors.

METHODS

193 gatekeepers completed an online survey to rate the obstacles they had experienced at work since completing a gatekeeper-training program and the support received from coworkers, supervisors, and the organization. Participants also reported the frequency of suicide-prevention behaviors performed.

RESULTS

The results indicated that both situational obstacles and social support predicted the number of suicide-prevention behaviors performed, as expected. There was also a trend that support from supervisors and the organization may alleviate the adverse effect of situational obstacles on suicide-prevention behavior.

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional nature of the study does not allow for directional, causal conclusions to be drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

By understanding the roles of situational obstacles faced by trained gatekeepers at their work and the support they receive from supervisors and organizations, appropriate strategies can be identified and applied to facilitate gatekeeper performance.

摘要

背景

尽管预防自杀守门员培训计划在提高知识、态度和转介实践方面的有效性已经得到证实,但这些效果似乎并不持久。

目的

本研究调查了工作中妨碍预防自杀守门员实施预防自杀行为的情境障碍,以及社会支持在改变情境障碍与预防自杀行为之间关系中的作用。

方法

193 名守门员完成了一项在线调查,评估他们自完成守门员培训计划以来在工作中所经历的障碍,以及从同事、主管和组织中获得的支持。参与者还报告了实施预防自杀行为的频率。

结果

结果表明,情境障碍和社会支持都如预期的那样预测了实施预防自杀行为的数量。此外,主管和组织的支持可能会减轻情境障碍对预防自杀行为的不利影响,这一趋势也很明显。

局限性

研究的横断面性质不允许得出有向的、因果结论。

结论

通过了解经过培训的守门员在工作中面临的情境障碍以及他们从主管和组织中获得的支持,我们可以确定并应用适当的策略来促进守门员的表现。

相似文献

1
The effects of situational obstacles and social support on suicide- prevention gatekeeper behaviors.情境障碍和社会支持对自杀预防守门人行为的影响。
Crisis. 2011;32(5):264-71. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000090.
2
Mental health of gatekeepers may influence their own attitudes toward suicide: A questionnaire survey from a suicide-prevention gatekeeper training program.守门人心理健康可能影响他们对自杀的态度:自杀预防守门人培训项目的问卷调查。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jan;47:101842. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101842. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
Suicide prevention in Aboriginal communities: application of community gatekeeper training.原住民社区的自杀预防:社区守门人培训的应用
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Aug;25(4):315-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00586.x.
4
Intention to Enact and Enactment of Gatekeeper Behaviors for Suicide Prevention: an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.制定自杀预防守门行为的意图与实施:计划行为理论的应用
Prev Sci. 2017 Aug;18(6):704-715. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0786-0.
5
[After the Great East Japan Earthquake : suicide prevention and a gatekeeper program].[东日本大地震之后:自杀预防与守门人计划]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2014;116(3):196-202.
6
Suicide prevention gatekeeper training in the Netherlands improves gatekeepers' knowledge of suicide prevention and their confidence to discuss suicidality, an observational study.一项观察性研究表明,荷兰的自杀预防守门人培训提高了守门人对自杀预防的认识以及他们讨论自杀倾向的信心。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 18;18(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5512-8.
7
Gatekeeper training as a preventative intervention for suicide: a systematic review.守门人培训作为自杀预防干预措施:一项系统综述
Can J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;54(4):260-8. doi: 10.1177/070674370905400407.
8
Development of the Pharm-SAVES educational module for gatekeeper suicide prevention training for community pharmacy staff.开发 Pharm-SAVES 教育模块,用于对社区药剂师进行守门人预防自杀培训。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1246-1254. doi: 10.1111/hex.13741. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
A qualitative study of factors involved in the helping behaviors of suicide prevention gatekeepers.一项关于自杀预防守门人助人行为相关因素的定性研究。
Death Stud. 2024 May;48(5):522-532. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2246018. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
10
Preventing adolescent suicide: A systematic review of the effectiveness and change mechanisms of suicide prevention gatekeeping training programs for teachers and parents.预防青少年自杀:教师和家长自杀预防门禁培训计划有效性和变化机制的系统评价。
J Adolesc. 2019 Jun;73:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer-based interventions targeting suicide prevention: A scoping review.基于同伴的自杀预防干预措施:范围综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(1-2):232-248. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12510. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Adolescent Decision-Making: The Value of Perceived Behavioral Control in Predicting Engagement in Suicide Prevention Behaviors.青少年决策:感知行为控制在预测参与预防自杀行为中的价值。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Sep;48(9):1784-1795. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01066-3. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Intention to Enact and Enactment of Gatekeeper Behaviors for Suicide Prevention: an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.
制定自杀预防守门行为的意图与实施:计划行为理论的应用
Prev Sci. 2017 Aug;18(6):704-715. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0786-0.
4
Gatekeeper Training for Suicide Prevention: A Theoretical Model and Review of the Empirical Literature.自杀预防的守门人培训:一个理论模型及实证文献综述
Rand Health Q. 2015 Jul 15;5(1):16.
5
The Influence of Training, Reluctance, Efficacy, and Stigma on Suicide Intervention Behavior Among NCOs in the Army and Marine Corps.训练、抵触情绪、效能感和污名对陆军和海军陆战队士官自杀干预行为的影响
J Prim Prev. 2016 Jun;37(3):287-302. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0419-6.