Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Inj Prev. 2012 Jun;18(3):182-6. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040042. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
The aim of this study was to compare attitudes regarding ski helmet use in helmet wearers and non-wearers.
In total, 924 persons ≥18 years (52% men and 48% women) participating in sport programmes at the University Sports Institute Innsbruck/Austria were interviewed about their attitudes regarding ski helmets and scored 14 statements on a five-level Likert Scale. A factor analysis was employed to determine clusters of underlying attitudes that have subsequently been used as predictors of helmet non-use in a conditional logistic regression analysis.
In total, 65% of participants declared to use a helmet during their preferred winter sport activity while more than 80% of helmet wearers and non-wearers totally agreed that helmets protect from head injuries. According to the factor analysis, attitudes about ski helmets clustered around four major dimensions-subjective disadvantages, safety awareness, comfort/style and risk compensation. Adjusted ORs of regression analysis showed that helmet non-use increased with age and decreased with increasing skill level (beginner: OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.6 to 11.1; intermediate: OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.4 to 7.9; advanced: OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 5.4). In addition, helmet non-use was associated with subjective disadvantages (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.9). However, a negative association between helmet non-use and safety awareness (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.4) was found.
Helmet use was associated with higher safety awareness, while most arguments against helmet use seem to belong to subjective perception and to represent anticipatory negative cognitions, poorly supported by evidence. Therefore, evidence-based information about wearing a ski helmet should be implemented in preventive helmet campaigns focusing on non-wearers. In addition, health communication programmes should be instituted to get non-helmeted skiers and snowboarders to try out helmets to eliminate their potential prejudices.
本研究旨在比较头盔佩戴者和非佩戴者对滑雪头盔使用的态度。
共有 924 名≥18 岁(52%为男性,48%为女性)参加奥地利因斯布鲁克大学运动学院运动项目的人接受了有关他们对滑雪头盔态度的访谈,并在 5 级李克特量表上对 14 项陈述进行了评分。采用因子分析确定潜在态度的聚类,随后在条件逻辑回归分析中用作头盔不使用的预测因子。
共有 65%的参与者表示在他们喜欢的冬季运动项目中使用头盔,而超过 80%的头盔佩戴者和非佩戴者完全同意头盔可以保护头部免受伤害。根据因子分析,滑雪头盔的态度围绕四个主要维度展开——主观劣势、安全意识、舒适度/风格和风险补偿。回归分析的调整后 OR 显示,头盔不使用随着年龄的增长而增加,随着技能水平的提高而减少(初学者:OR 5.4,95%CI 2.6 至 11.1;中级:OR 4.3,95%CI 2.4 至 7.9;高级:OR 3.1,95%CI 1.7 至 5.4)。此外,头盔不使用与主观劣势有关(OR 2.3,95%CI 1.8 至 2.9)。然而,头盔不使用与安全意识之间呈负相关(OR 0.3,95%CI 0.2 至 0.4)。
头盔的使用与更高的安全意识有关,而大多数反对头盔使用的论据似乎属于主观认知,并且证据不足。因此,应在关注非佩戴者的预防头盔宣传活动中纳入有关佩戴滑雪头盔的循证信息。此外,应开展健康传播计划,让不戴头盔的滑雪者和单板滑雪者尝试佩戴头盔,以消除他们的潜在偏见。