• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知到的视觉和触觉刺激的持续时间取决于感知到的速度。

Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed.

机构信息

Department of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:51. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00051. eCollection 2011.

DOI:10.3389/fnint.2011.00051
PMID:21941471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170919/
Abstract

IT IS KNOWN THAT THE PERCEIVED DURATION OF VISUAL STIMULI IS STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY SPEED

faster moving stimuli appear to last longer. To test whether this is a general property of sensory systems we asked participants to reproduce the duration of visual and tactile gratings, and visuo-tactile gratings moving at a variable speed (3.5-15 cm/s) for three different durations (400, 600, and 800 ms). For both modalities, the apparent duration of the stimulus increased strongly with stimulus speed, more so for tactile than for visual stimuli. In addition, visual stimuli were perceived to last approximately 200 ms longer than tactile stimuli. The apparent duration of visuo-tactile stimuli lay between the unimodal estimates, as the Bayesian account predicts, but the bimodal precision of the reproduction did not show the theoretical improvement. A cross-modal speed-matching task revealed that visual stimuli were perceived to move faster than tactile stimuli. To test whether the large difference in the perceived duration of visual and tactile stimuli resulted from the difference in their perceived speed, we repeated the time reproduction task with visual and tactile stimuli matched in apparent speed. This reduced, but did not completely eliminate the difference in apparent duration. These results show that for both vision and touch, perceived duration depends on speed, pointing to common strategies of time perception.

摘要

众所周知,视觉刺激的感知持续时间受到速度的强烈影响:移动速度较快的刺激看起来持续时间更长。为了测试这是否是感觉系统的一般特性,我们要求参与者复制视觉和触觉条纹以及以可变速度(3.5-15 厘米/秒)移动的视触条纹的持续时间,持续时间为三个不同的时间(400、600 和 800 毫秒)。对于两种感觉模式,刺激速度与刺激的感知持续时间之间的关系非常强烈,触觉刺激比视觉刺激更为明显。此外,视觉刺激的感知持续时间比触觉刺激长约 200 毫秒。如贝叶斯理论所预测,视触刺激的感知持续时间介于单模态估计之间,但复制的双模态精度并未显示出理论上的改善。跨模态速度匹配任务表明,视觉刺激的感知速度快于触觉刺激。为了测试视觉和触觉刺激的感知持续时间差异是否源于其感知速度的差异,我们用视觉和触觉刺激在表观速度上进行匹配,重复了时间复制任务。这减少了,但并没有完全消除感知持续时间的差异。这些结果表明,对于视觉和触觉,感知持续时间取决于速度,这表明时间感知存在共同的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/8824d857fc36/fnint-05-00051-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/5a0aba570def/fnint-05-00051-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/cac39f6c2fca/fnint-05-00051-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/325ced713b51/fnint-05-00051-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/7b4a79fe2c75/fnint-05-00051-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/149d2cb58dbf/fnint-05-00051-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/aaed157f48e0/fnint-05-00051-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/b619d868486d/fnint-05-00051-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/8824d857fc36/fnint-05-00051-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/5a0aba570def/fnint-05-00051-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/cac39f6c2fca/fnint-05-00051-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/325ced713b51/fnint-05-00051-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/7b4a79fe2c75/fnint-05-00051-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/149d2cb58dbf/fnint-05-00051-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/aaed157f48e0/fnint-05-00051-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/b619d868486d/fnint-05-00051-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdb3/3170919/8824d857fc36/fnint-05-00051-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed.感知到的视觉和触觉刺激的持续时间取决于感知到的速度。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:51. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00051. eCollection 2011.
2
Cross-modal sensory integration of visual-tactile motion information: instrument design and human psychophysics.视觉-触觉运动信息的跨模态感觉整合:仪器设计与人类心理物理学。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 May 31;13(6):7212-23. doi: 10.3390/s130607212.
3
Visuo-tactile heading perception.视触空间头位感知。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Nov 1;128(5):1355-1364. doi: 10.1152/jn.00231.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Direction-selective modulation of visual motion rivalry by collocated tactile motion.共定位触觉运动对视觉运动竞争的方向选择性调制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):899-914. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02453-y. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
Everything is worth when it is close to my body: How spatial proximity and stimulus valence affect visuo-tactile integration.当一切贴近我的身体时,一切都值得:空间 proximity 和刺激效价如何影响视觉触觉整合。 (注:proximity 常见释义为“接近;临近” ,这里“spatial proximity” 可理解为“空间接近” ,但原英文表述中此词使用不太准确规范)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.特定模态注意力通过降低对视觉和触觉共同来源的先验期望,减弱了视觉-触觉整合及重新校准效应。
Cognition. 2020 Apr;197:104170. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104170. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
RoMAT: Robot for Multisensory Analysis and Testing of visual-tactile perceptual functions.RoMAT:用于视觉触觉感知功能的多感觉分析和测试的机器人。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:4781-4786. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630479.
8
Multimodal Ternus: visual, tactile, and visuo-tactile grouping in apparent motion.多模态特努斯:似动中的视觉、触觉和视触觉分组
Perception. 2007;36(10):1455-64. doi: 10.1068/p5844.
9
Long integration time for accelerating and decelerating visual, tactile and visuo-tactile stimuli.用于加速和减速视觉、触觉以及视觉-触觉刺激的长积分时间。
Multisens Res. 2013;26(1-2):53-68. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002397.
10
Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception.视觉运动对触觉运动感知的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1625-37. doi: 10.1152/jn.00192.2006. Epub 2006 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the perception and metacognition of time.测量时间的感知和元认知。
J Vis. 2024 Mar 1;24(3):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.3.5.
2
Movement-related tactile gating in blindness.运动相关触觉门控在盲视中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 2;13(1):16553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43526-8.
3
Enriched sensory feedback delivered during a voluntary action boosts subjective time compression.在自愿行动过程中提供丰富的感觉反馈会增强主观时间压缩。

本文引用的文献

1
Neural underpinnings of distortions in the experience of time across senses.跨感官体验时间扭曲的神经基础。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Jul 28;5:32. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2011.00032. eCollection 2011.
2
Cross-Sensory Facilitation Reveals Neural Interactions between Visual and Tactile Motion in Humans.跨感觉通道促进揭示了人类视觉与触觉运动之间的神经相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 13;2:55. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00055. eCollection 2011.
3
Neural mechanisms of tactile motion integration in somatosensory cortex.躯体感觉皮层中触觉运动整合的神经机制。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1140569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140569. eCollection 2023.
4
Keep your finger on the pulse: Better rate perception and gap detection with vibrotactile compared to visual stimuli.时刻关注脉搏:与视觉刺激相比,振动触觉可更好地感知和检测差距。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):2004-2017. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02736-y. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
5
Temporal judgments of actions following unilateral brain damage.单侧脑损伤后对动作的时间判断。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 15;12(1):21668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26070-9.
6
Exploring Tactile Stimuli from a Wrist-Worn Device to Manipulate Subjective Time Based on the Filled-Duration Illusion.基于填充时间错觉,探索腕戴设备产生的触觉刺激对主观时间的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;22(19):7194. doi: 10.3390/s22197194.
7
Weighted Integration of Duration Information Across Visual and Auditory Modality Is Influenced by Modality-Specific Attention.跨视觉和听觉通道的持续时间信息的加权整合受通道特异性注意的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 7;15:725449. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.725449. eCollection 2021.
8
Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.视觉和触觉的时长比较取决于呈现顺序和时间背景。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2021 Jun 23;15:664264. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2021.664264. eCollection 2021.
9
Tapping Force Encodes Metrical Aspects of Rhythm.敲击力度编码节奏的韵律方面。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 22;15:633956. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.633956. eCollection 2021.
10
A sensory integration account for time perception.一种感觉统合解释时间感知。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jan 29;17(1):e1008668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008668. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Neuron. 2011 Feb 10;69(3):536-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.033.
4
Tactile duration compression by vibrotactile adaptation.通过振动触觉适应实现触觉持续时间压缩
Neuroreport. 2010 Sep 15;21(13):856-60. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833d6bcb.
5
Sensory-specific clock components and memory mechanisms: investigation with parallel timing.感觉特异性时钟组件与记忆机制:并行计时研究
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(10):1908-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07197.x.
6
Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed.视觉运动的感知持续时间随速度增加。
J Vis. 2009 Jul 22;9(7):14. doi: 10.1167/9.7.14.
7
Optimal integration of auditory and vibrotactile information for judgments of temporal order.用于时间顺序判断的听觉和振动触觉信息的最佳整合。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1005-19. doi: 10.1037/a0015021.
8
Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.听觉优势于视觉在时间间隔感知中的体现。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1933-z. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
9
Motion aftereffects transfer between touch and vision.运动后效在触觉和视觉之间转移。
Curr Biol. 2009 May 12;19(9):745-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.035. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
10
Human time perception and its illusions.人类的时间感知及其错觉。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 8.