• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估不同类型疝修补网片修复的生活质量结果时的测量问题。

Measurement issues when assessing quality of life outcomes for different types of hernia mesh repair.

作者信息

Zaborszky Andras, Gyanti Rita, Barry John A, Saxby Brian K, Bhattacharya Panchanan, Hasan Fazal A

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Benenden Hospital, Cranbrook, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 May;93(4):281-5. doi: 10.1308/003588411X13020150727480.

DOI:10.1308/003588411X13020150727480
PMID:21944792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3363076/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The NHS is required to collect data from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for inguinal hernia surgery. We explored the use of one such measure, the Carolinas Comfort Scale(®) (CCS), to compare long-term outcomes for patients who received two different types of mesh. The CCS questionnaire asks about mesh sensation, pain and movement limitations, and combines the answers into a total score.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 684 patients were treated between January 2007 and August 2008 and were followed up in November 2009.

RESULTS

Data on 215 patients who met the inclusion criteria were available (96 patients who received Surgipro™ mesh and 119 who received Parietene™ Progrip™ mesh). Recurrence rates were similar in the Surgipro™ group (2/96, 2.1%) and Progrip™ group (3/118, 2.5%) (Fisher's exact test = 1.0). Chronic pain occurred less frequently in the Surgipro™ group (11/95, 11.6%) than in the Progrip™ group (22/118, 18.6%) (p<0.157). Overall, 90% of CCS total scores indicated a good outcome (scores of 10 or less out of 115). A principal component analysis of the CCS found that responses clustered into two subscales: 'mesh sensation' and 'pain+movement limitations'. The Progrip™ group had a slightly higher mesh sensation score (p<0.051) and similar pain+movement limitations scores (p<0.120).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of quality of life outcomes related to different mesh types, the CCS subscales were more sensitive to differences in outcome than the total CCS score for the whole questionnaire. Future research should consider using the CCS subscales rather than the CCS total score.

摘要

引言

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)被要求收集腹股沟疝手术患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的数据。我们探讨了使用一种这样的测量方法,即卡罗莱纳舒适度量表(®)(CCS),来比较接受两种不同类型补片的患者的长期结局。CCS问卷询问补片感觉、疼痛和活动受限情况,并将答案合并为一个总分。

患者与方法

2007年1月至2008年8月期间共治疗了684例患者,并于2009年11月进行随访。

结果

有215例符合纳入标准的患者的数据可用(96例接受Surgipro™补片,119例接受Parietene™Progrip™补片)。Surgipro™组(2/96,2.1%)和Progrip™组(3/118,2.5%)的复发率相似(Fisher精确检验=1.0)。Surgipro™组慢性疼痛的发生率(11/95,11.6%)低于Progrip™组(22/118,18.6%)(p<0.157)。总体而言,90%的CCS总分表明结局良好(115分中得分为10分或更低)。对CCS进行主成分分析发现,回答聚集为两个子量表:“补片感觉”和“疼痛+活动受限”。Progrip™组的补片感觉得分略高(p<0.051),疼痛+活动受限得分相似(p<0.120)。

结论

在这项关于不同补片类型相关生活质量结局的研究中,CCS子量表比整个问卷的CCS总分对结局差异更敏感。未来的研究应考虑使用CCS子量表而非CCS总分。

相似文献

1
Measurement issues when assessing quality of life outcomes for different types of hernia mesh repair.评估不同类型疝修补网片修复的生活质量结果时的测量问题。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 May;93(4):281-5. doi: 10.1308/003588411X13020150727480.
2
The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术中使用自固定(Progrip™)补片:一项前瞻性可行性及长期疗效研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2690-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3991-y. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
3
Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair.疝气补片修复术后的头三个月内,与健康相关的生活质量评分会发生显著变化。
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1852-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2411-0.
4
Medium-Term Recurrence and Quality of Life Assessment Using the Hernia-Specific Carolinas Comfort Scale Following Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后使用疝气专用卡罗莱纳舒适度量表进行中期复发率及生活质量评估
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jun;25(6):477-80. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0077. Epub 2015 May 6.
5
Inguinal hernia mesh is safe in 1720 patients.腹股沟疝补片在 1720 例患者中是安全的。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1609-1618. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08442-w. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months.自固定 Parietex™ ProGrip™ 聚酯网片与轻质聚丙烯网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的随机对照多中心国际临床试验:3 个月时的中期结果。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):287-94. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0900-y. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
7
Quality of life following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery with self-adhesive mesh in 552 patients: a two surgeon experience.552 例应用自黏补片行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的生活质量:两位外科医生的经验。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2487-2491. doi: 10.1111/ans.17860. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Carolinas Comfort Scale to Brazilian Portuguese for inguinal hernia.卡罗来纳舒适度量表跨文化调适及巴西葡萄牙语版本验证用于腹股沟疝
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 16;409(1):253. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03445-2.
9
A new semiresorbable mesh for primary inguinal repair: a preliminary observational study on quality of life and safety.一种新型可部分吸收的网片用于原发性腹股沟疝修补术:生活质量和安全性的初步观察研究。
Hernia. 2020 Oct;24(5):1019-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02276-6. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的自粘补片。单中心经验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Jun;69(3):167-76. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the carolinas comfort scale (CCS) in Brazil: a hernia-specific quality of life questionnaire.卡罗莱纳舒适度量表(CCS)在巴西的验证:一种疝特异性生活质量问卷。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1783-1788. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03083-z. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
2
Quality of life of inguinal hernia patients in Taiwan: The application of the hernia-specific quality of life assessment instrument.台湾腹股沟疝患者的生活质量:疝特异性生活质量评估工具的应用。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183138. eCollection 2017.
3
Does peritoneal flap closure technique following transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair make a difference in postoperative pain? A long-term quality of life comparison.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术后的腹膜瓣关闭技术对术后疼痛有影响吗?一项长期生活质量比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2548-2559. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5258-2. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
4
Is chronic post-herniorrhaphy pain always chronic? A literature review.疝修补术后慢性疼痛总是慢性的吗?一项文献综述。
J Pain Res. 2015 May 22;8:241-5. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S82708. eCollection 2015.
5
Tacks, staples, or suture: method of peritoneal closure in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair effects early quality of life.缝钉、吻合器或缝线:腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜关闭方法对早期生活质量的影响
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1686-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3857-3. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
6
A preoperative hernia symptom score predicts inguinal hernia anatomy and outcomes after TEP repair.术前疝症状评分可预测经腹膜前修补术(TEP)后的腹股沟疝解剖结构及手术结果。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):481-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3692-6.
7
Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after hernia mesh repair.疝气补片修复术后的头三个月内,与健康相关的生活质量评分会发生显著变化。
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1852-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2411-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings.在医疗保健环境中常规使用患者报告的结果测量。
BMJ. 2010 Jan 18;340:c186. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c186.
2
Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a longitudinal self-assessment study.开放式腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛:纵向自我评估研究。
Hernia. 2010 Jun;14(3):249-52. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0615-x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
3
Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh.使用创新的自固定半可吸收补片进行无张力开放式疝修补术。
Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0451-4. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
4
Comparing quality-of-life outcomes in symptomatic patients undergoing laparoscopic or open ventral hernia repair.比较接受腹腔镜或开放腹疝修补术的有症状患者的生活质量结果。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Aug;18(4):567-71. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0192.
5
Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs.用于腹股沟疝修补术的通用型与特定型生活质量量表的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
6
Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病通用(SF - 36)与疾病特异性(GERD - HRQL)生活质量量表的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;2(2):141-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80004-8.
7
The operation of Bassini as described by Attilio Catterina.阿蒂利奥·卡特琳娜所描述的巴西尼手术。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Jan;168(1):67-80.