Suppr超能文献

述评:我们是否有一个一致的物种多样性术语?真正多样性的谬论。

Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity.

机构信息

Department of Biology and School of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2011 Dec;167(4):885-8; discussion 903-11. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2124-8. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

Abstract

There is no single best index that can be used to answer all questions about species diversity. Entropy-based diversity indices, including Hill's indices, cannot account for geographical and phylogenetic structure. While a single diversity index arises if we impose several constraints-most notably that gamma diversity be completely decomposed into alpha and beta diversity-there are many ecological questions regarding species diversity for which it is counterproductive, requiring decomposability. Non-decomposable components of gamma diversity may quantify important intrinsic ecological properties, such as resilience or nestedness.

摘要

没有一个单一的最佳指标可以用来回答关于物种多样性的所有问题。基于熵的多样性指数,包括希氏指数,无法解释地理和系统发育结构。虽然如果我们施加几个约束条件(最明显的是伽马多样性完全分解为α和β多样性),就会出现一个单一的多样性指数,但对于物种多样性,有许多生态问题要求不可分解性。伽马多样性的不可分解成分可能量化了重要的内在生态特性,如弹性或嵌套性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验