De Kam Daniël C J, Busch Vincent J J F, Veth René P H, Schreurs B Willem
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hip Int. 2011 Sep-Oct;21(5):518-25. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8641.
We examined all reported outcomes of uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age listed in Medline (1966- 1 January 2009) and PubMed, and scrutinised reference lists of relevant papers. In addition, we evaluated relevant data in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. 109 relevant articles were identified, 37 of which had a mean follow-up longer than 10 years. Although uncemented implants are widely used in patients under 50 years of age, there are only 2 reports that fulfil the criteria published by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom (follow-up of >10 yrs and survival of =90%). Current trends relating to implant selection remain unsupported by survival data, and additional information about the long-term results of newer implants is essential. As matters stand, the most reliable results relate to cemented implants.
我们查阅了Medline(1966年至2009年1月1日)和PubMed中列出的所有关于50岁以下患者非骨水泥型和骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的报告结果,并仔细审查了相关论文的参考文献列表。此外,我们评估了瑞典髋关节置换登记处的相关数据。共识别出109篇相关文章,其中37篇的平均随访时间超过10年。尽管非骨水泥型植入物在50岁以下患者中广泛使用,但仅有2篇报告符合英国国家临床优化研究所(NICE)发布的标准(随访时间>10年且生存率=90%)。目前关于植入物选择的趋势仍缺乏生存数据的支持,关于新型植入物长期结果的更多信息至关重要。就目前情况而言,最可靠的结果与骨水泥型植入物有关。