Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3:89-102. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604382.
Few studies have examined the effectiveness of teaching strategies to improve patients' recall and retention of information. As a next step in implementing a literacy-appropriate, multimedia diabetes education program (MDEP), the present study reports the results of two experiments designed to answer (a) how much knowledge is retained 2 weeks after viewing the MDEP, (b) does knowledge retention differ across literacy levels, and (c) does adding a teach-back protocol after the MDEP improve knowledge retention at 2-weeks' follow-up? In Experiment 1, adult primary care patients (n = 113) watched the MDEP and answered knowledge-based questions about diabetes before and after viewing the MDEP. Two weeks later, participants completed the knowledge assessment a third time. Methods and procedures for Experiment 2 (n = 58) were exactly the same, except that if participants answered a question incorrectly after watching the MDEP, they received teach-back, wherein the information was reviewed and the question was asked again, up to two times. Two weeks later, Experiment 2 participants completed the knowledge assessment again. Literacy was measured using the S-TOFHLA. After 2 weeks, all participants, regardless of their literacy levels, forgot approximately half the new information they had learned from the MDEP. In regression models, adding a teach-back protocol did not improve knowledge retention among participants and literacy was not associated with knowledge retention at 2 weeks. Health education interventions must incorporate strategies that can improve retention of health information and actively engage patients in long-term learning.
几乎没有研究检验过教授策略以提高患者对信息的回忆和保留效果。作为实施适宜读写能力的多媒体糖尿病教育计划(MDEP)的下一步,本研究报告了两项旨在回答以下问题的实验结果:(a)观看 MDEP 后 2 周内保留了多少知识,(b)知识保留是否因读写能力水平而异,以及(c)在 MDEP 之后添加回授协议是否会提高 2 周随访时的知识保留?在实验 1 中,成年初级保健患者(n = 113)观看了 MDEP,并在观看前后回答了有关糖尿病的基于知识的问题。两周后,参与者第三次完成了知识评估。实验 2(n = 58)的方法和程序完全相同,只是如果参与者在观看 MDEP 后答错了问题,他们会接受回授,即复习信息并再次提问,最多可问两次。两周后,实验 2 的参与者再次完成了知识评估。读写能力使用 S-TOFHLA 进行测量。两周后,无论读写能力水平如何,所有参与者都忘记了大约一半从 MDEP 中学到的新知识。在回归模型中,添加回授协议并不能提高参与者的知识保留率,读写能力与 2 周时的知识保留率无关。健康教育干预措施必须纳入可以提高健康信息保留率的策略,并让患者积极参与长期学习。