School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Dec;34(6):1480-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22823. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
To evaluate effects of combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired from different field strengths on group analysis as a function of the number of subjects at each field strength.
In all, 28 subjects (18 at 3T) participated in an auditory task of passively listening to a 0.75s segment of jazz music in an event-related design. Results of single-subject analysis were combined to create all possible subject combinations for a group size of eight subjects from each of the 3T and 1.5T pools, comprising subject mixtures of (3T/1.5T) 0/8, 2/6, 4/4, 6/2, and 8/0. Group analysis performance of each subject permutation was measured by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and activation overlap maps.
While area under ROC curves, extent of activation in the gold standard region, and reliability of activation increased with the number of 3T subjects, marginal gain decreased. ROC performance overlap across mixtures was observed, indicating that some combinations of subjects markedly outperformed others. For detection of activation, 4/4 was arguably the minimum mixture level that was comparable to 3T-only group results.
Inclusion of 1.5T data does not necessarily reduce the validity of group analysis. Lower field strength data was found only to limit detection power, but did not affect specificity. Within the limits of realignment error, these results should also extend to group longitudinal analyses of subject mixtures from different field strengths.
评估将不同场强下采集的功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 数据结合进行组分析的效果,作为每个场强下的受试者数量的函数。
共有 28 名受试者(18 名在 3T 下)参与了一项听觉任务,即被动聆听一段 0.75 秒长的爵士音乐片段,采用事件相关设计。对每个受试者的单因素分析结果进行组合,创建了来自 3T 和 1.5T 两个池的每个组大小为 8 名受试者的所有可能的受试者组合,包括 3T/1.5T 为 0/8、2/6、4/4、6/2 和 8/0 的受试者混合物。通过接收者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线和激活重叠图来测量每个受试者排列的组分析性能。
虽然 ROC 曲线下面积、金标准区域的激活程度和激活的可靠性随着 3T 受试者数量的增加而增加,但边际收益却减少了。观察到混合物之间的 ROC 性能重叠,表明某些受试者组合明显优于其他组合。对于激活的检测,4/4 可以说是与仅 3T 组结果相当的最小混合水平。
纳入 1.5T 数据不一定会降低组分析的有效性。较低场强的数据仅限制了检测能力,但不影响特异性。在重新定位误差的限制内,这些结果也应扩展到来自不同场强的受试者混合物的组纵向分析。