International Center for Research on Women, Washington, D,C, (20036), USA.
Global Health. 2011 Sep 30;7:34. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-34.
'Transactional sex' was regarded by the mid-1990s as an important determinant of HIV transmission, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Little attention has been paid to what the terms used to denote transactional sex suggest about how it is understood. This study provides a nuanced set of descriptions of the meaning of transactional sex in three settings. Furthermore, we discuss how discourses around transactional sex suggest linkages to processes of globalization and hold implications for vulnerability to HIV.
The analysis in this article is based on three case studies conducted as part of a multi-country research project that investigated linkages between economic globalization and HIV. In this analysis, we contextualize and contrast the 'talk' about transactional sex through the following research methods in three study sites: descriptions revealed through semi-structured interviews with garment workers in Lesotho; focus groups with young women and men in Antananarivo, Madagascar; and focus groups and in-depth interviews with young women and men in Mbekweni, South Africa.
Participants' talk about transactional sex reveals two themes: (1) 'The politics of differentiation' reflects how participants used language to demarcate identities, and distance themselves from contextually-based marginalized identities; and (2) 'Gender, agency and power' describes how participants frame gendered-power within the context of transactional sex practices, and reflects on the limitations to women's power as sexual agents in these exchanges. Talk about transactional sex in our study settings supports the assertion that emerging transactional sexual practices are linked with processes of globalization tied to consumerism.
By focusing on 'talk' about transactional sex, we locate definitions of transactional sex, and how terms used to describe transactional sex are morally framed for people within their local context. We take advantage of an opportunity to comparatively explore such talk across three different study sites, and contribute to a better understanding of both emerging sexual practices and their implications for HIV vulnerability. Our work underlines that transactional sex needs to be reflected as it is perceived: something very different from, but of at least equal concern to, formal sex work in the efforts to curb HIV transmission.
20 世纪 90 年代中期,“交易性行为”被认为是艾滋病毒传播的一个重要决定因素,尤其是在撒哈拉以南非洲地区。人们很少关注用于表示交易性行为的术语在理解方面的含义。本研究在三个背景下提供了一组关于交易性行为含义的细微描述。此外,我们还讨论了关于交易性行为的论述如何与全球化进程联系起来,并对艾滋病毒易感性产生影响。
本文的分析基于作为一项多国研究项目的一部分进行的三项案例研究,该项目调查了经济全球化与艾滋病毒之间的联系。在这项分析中,我们通过以下研究方法在三个研究地点对交易性行为的“言论”进行了背景化和对比:在莱索托与制衣工人进行的半结构式访谈中揭示的描述;马达加斯加塔那那利佛的青年男女焦点小组;以及南非姆贝肯尼的青年男女焦点小组和深入访谈。
参与者对交易性行为的看法揭示了两个主题:(1)“差异化的政治”反映了参与者如何使用语言来划分身份,并与基于背景的边缘化身份保持距离;(2)“性别、能动性和权力”描述了参与者如何在交易性行为实践的背景下构建性别权力,并反思女性作为性代理人在这些交换中的权力限制。我们研究背景下的关于交易性行为的讨论支持了这样一种观点,即新兴的交易性行为与与消费主义相关的全球化进程有关。
通过关注关于交易性行为的“言论”,我们将交易性行为的定义以及用于描述交易性行为的术语在人们的当地背景下的道德框架定位。我们利用了一个机会,在三个不同的研究地点比较性地探讨了这种言论,并对新兴性行为及其对艾滋病毒易感性的影响有了更好的理解。我们的工作强调,交易性行为需要像人们所感知的那样得到反映:这与遏制艾滋病毒传播的正式性工作有很大的不同,但至少同样值得关注。