• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统探索与在 VA 中实施 MOVE!体重管理计划相关的背景因素差异:一项混合方法研究。

A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 30;11:248. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-248.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-248
PMID:21961925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3206421/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In January 2006, Veterans Affairs (VA) disseminated the MOVE!® Weight Management Program to VA medical centers to address the high prevalence of overweight/obesity. In its second year, MOVE! implementation varied widely across facilities. The objective of this study was to understand contextual factors that facilitated or impeded implementation of MOVE! in VA medical centers in the second year after its dissemination.

METHODS

We used an embedded mixed methods cross-sectional study design. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously with the primary purpose to explore contextual factors most likely to influence MOVE! implementation effectiveness at five purposively selected facilities. Facilities were selected to maximize variation with respect to participation in MOVE! by candidate Veterans. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 24 staff across the five facilities. Quantitative responses were elicited followed by open-ended questions. The quantitative measures were adapted from a published implementation model. Qualitative analysis was conducted using rigorous content analysis methods.

RESULTS

Qualitative and quantitative data converged to strengthen findings that point to several recommendations. Management support can help increase visibility of the program, commit needed resources, and communicate the importance of implementation efforts. Establishing a receptive implementation climate can be accomplished by emphasizing the important role that weight management may have in reducing incidence and severity of obesity-related chronic conditions. Coalescing highly functioning multi-disciplinary teams was an essential step for more effective implementation of MOVE!. In some situations, local champions can overcome challenging barriers in facilities that lack sufficient management support.

CONCLUSIONS

Key organizational factors at local VA medical centers were strongly associated with MOVE! implementation. Results pointed to recommendations that can help accelerate large-scale dissemination of complex weight management programs.

摘要

背景

2006 年 1 月,退伍军人事务部(VA)向退伍军人事务医疗中心传播 MOVE!®体重管理计划,以解决超重/肥胖的高患病率。在第二年,MOVE!在设施之间的实施差异很大。本研究的目的是了解促进或阻碍 MOVE!在传播后的第二年在退伍军人事务医疗中心实施的环境因素。

方法

我们使用了嵌入式混合方法的横断面研究设计。定性和定量数据同时收集,主要目的是探索在五个有目的选择的设施中最有可能影响 MOVE!实施效果的环境因素。这些设施是为了最大限度地增加有资格参加 MOVE!的退伍军人的参与度而选择的。对五个设施中的 24 名工作人员进行了半结构式电话访谈。定量反应后提出了开放式问题。定量测量方法改编自已发表的实施模型。定性分析采用严格的内容分析方法。

结果

定性和定量数据的融合加强了研究结果,这些结果指出了一些建议。管理层的支持可以帮助提高项目的可见度,承诺所需的资源,并传达实施工作的重要性。通过强调体重管理在减少肥胖相关慢性病的发病率和严重程度方面可能发挥的重要作用,可以建立一个乐于接受的实施环境。形成高效的多学科团队是 MOVE!更有效实施的关键步骤。在某些情况下,当地的拥护者可以克服缺乏足够管理支持的设施中的挑战性障碍。

结论

退伍军人事务医疗中心的关键组织因素与 MOVE!的实施密切相关。结果指出了一些建议,可以帮助加速复杂的体重管理项目的大规模传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da7/3206421/2ba3e5950db8/1472-6963-11-248-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da7/3206421/5f70f7ffdffb/1472-6963-11-248-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da7/3206421/2ba3e5950db8/1472-6963-11-248-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da7/3206421/5f70f7ffdffb/1472-6963-11-248-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da7/3206421/2ba3e5950db8/1472-6963-11-248-2.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: a mixed methods study.系统探索与在 VA 中实施 MOVE!体重管理计划相关的背景因素差异:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 30;11:248. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-248.
2
Implementing the MOVE! weight-management program in the Veterans Health Administration, 2007-2010: a qualitative study.2007-2010 年在美国退伍军人事务部实施 MOVE! 体重管理项目:一项定性研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E16. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)评估大规模体重管理计划。
Implement Sci. 2013 May 10;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-51.
4
Best practices in the Veterans Health Administration's MOVE! Weight management program.退伍军人健康管理局 MOVE!体重管理项目的最佳实践。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):457-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.047.
5
Barriers and facilitators to providing primary care-based weight management services in a patient centered medical home for Veterans: a qualitative study.在以患者为中心的退伍军人医疗之家提供基于初级保健的体重管理服务的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Nov 14;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0383-x.
6
Factors affecting the implementation of evidence-based Progressive Tinnitus Management in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.影响退伍军人事务部医疗中心实施基于证据的渐进性耳鸣管理的因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0242007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242007. eCollection 2020.
7
Development of a 5As-based technology-assisted weight management intervention for veterans in primary care.为初级保健中的退伍军人开发一种基于5A的技术辅助体重管理干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 29;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2834-2.
8
Diabetes Prevention Program Translation in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局的糖尿病预防计划翻译
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.009. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
9
Implementation and evaluation of the VA DPP clinical demonstration: protocol for a multi-site non-randomized hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.退伍军人事务部糖尿病预防计划临床示范的实施与评估:一项多中心非随机混合有效性-实施III型试验方案
Implement Sci. 2015 May 12;10:68. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0250-0.
10
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of VA home-based primary care on American Indian reservations: a qualitative multi-case study.美国印第安人保留地实施 VA 家庭初级保健的障碍和促进因素:一项定性多案例研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0632-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework.《实施研究综合框架(CFIR)用户指南:使用该框架进行实施研究的五步指南》
Implement Sci. 2025 Aug 16;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01450-7.
2
Investigating the Delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program to Latines: Coaches' Perspectives.调查针对拉丁裔群体的国家糖尿病预防计划的实施情况:教练的观点。
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf024.
3
Determinants of implementing the 15-method in Danish general practice using the consolidated framework for implementation science.

本文引用的文献

1
The Economic Cost of Physical Inactivity and Excess Weight in American Adults.美国成年人身体活动不足和超重的经济成本。
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Apr;3(2):148-163. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.2.148.
2
Roles of managers, frontline staff and local champions, in implementing quality improvement: stakeholders' perspectives.管理者、一线员工和当地拥护者在实施质量改进中的角色:利益相关者的观点。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01518.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
3
Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008.
运用实施科学整合框架确定丹麦全科医疗中采用15种方法的决定因素。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 May 16;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00571-0.
4
Weighing your options-intragastric balloon versus semaglutide.权衡你的选择——胃内球囊与司美格鲁肽。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6070-6075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11169-z. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
Provider reported value and use of virtual resources in extended primary care prior to and during COVID-19.提供者在 COVID-19 之前和期间报告扩展初级保健中虚拟资源的使用情况和价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 15;22(1):1353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08752-2.
6
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
7
Factors Influencing Fidelity to a Calorie Posting Policy in Public Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study.影响公立医院执行卡路里公示政策的因素:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 13;9:707668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.707668. eCollection 2021.
8
Determinants of Risk-Aligned Bladder Cancer Surveillance-Mixed-Methods Evaluation Using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases Framework.基于慢性病个体化实施框架的膀胱癌风险监测混合方法评估:决定因素。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Jan;18(1):e152-e162. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00226. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of an evidence-based health promotion intervention in a primary care setting: a qualitative study.在基层医疗环境中实施基于证据的健康促进干预的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Sep 2;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):349-67. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2020-0512.
10
"My Patients Asked Me If I Owned a Fruit Stand in Town or Something." Barriers and Facilitators of Personalized Dietary Advice Implemented in a Primary Care Setting.“我的病人问我是不是在镇上开了个水果店之类的。”基层医疗环境中实施个性化饮食建议的障碍与促进因素
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(8):747. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080747.
美国成年人肥胖率的流行趋势及变化,1999-2008 年。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):235-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2014. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
4
Direct medical cost of overweight and obesity in the USA: a quantitative systematic review.美国超重和肥胖的直接医疗成本:一项定量系统评价。
Obes Rev. 2011 Jan;12(1):50-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00708.x.
5
The role of the champion in infection prevention: results from a multisite qualitative study.倡导者在感染预防中的作用:一项多地点定性研究的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Dec;18(6):434-40. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.034199.
6
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.促进卫生服务研究成果在实践中的应用:推进实施科学的综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
7
Design and dissemination of the MOVE! Weight-Management Program for Veterans.为退伍军人设计并推广“行动起来!”体重管理项目。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jul;6(3):A98. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
8
The impact of obesity on diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension in the United States.肥胖对美国糖尿病、高脂血症和高血压的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2008 Oct;17(8):1063-71. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9385-7. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
9
Implementation of a clinical innovation: the case of advanced clinic access in the Department of Veterans Affairs.一项临床创新的实施:退伍军人事务部高级门诊服务的案例
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Apr-Jun;31(2):94-108. doi: 10.1097/01.JAC.0000314699.04301.3e.
10
Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model.医疗保健系统的转型变革:一种组织模式。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):309-20. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d.