• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响公立医院执行卡路里公示政策的因素:一项混合方法研究。

Factors Influencing Fidelity to a Calorie Posting Policy in Public Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Discipline of Health Promotion, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 13;9:707668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.707668. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.707668
PMID:34485232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8414889/
Abstract

Labelling menus with nutrition information has increasingly become an important obesity policy option. While much research to-date has focused on determining its effectiveness, few studies report the extent to which menu labelling is implemented as designed. The aim of this study was to explore factors influencing fidelity to a calorie posting policy in Irish acute public hospitals. A mixed methods sequential explanatory study design was employed, with a nested case study for the qualitative component. Quantitative data on implementation fidelity at hospitals were analysed first and informed case sampling in the follow-on qualitative phase. Maximum variation sampling was used to select four hospitals with high and low levels of implementation and variation in terms of geographic location, hospital size, complexity of care provided and hospital type. Data were collected using structured observations, unstructured non-participant observations and in-depth semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided qualitative data collection and analysis. Using framework analysis, factors influencing implementation were identified. A triangulation protocol was used to integrate fidelity findings from multiple sources. Data on influencing factors and fidelity were then combined using joint displays for within and cross-case analysis. Quantitative fidelity data showed seven hospitals were categorised as low implementers and 28 hospitals were high implementers of the policy. Across the four hospitals selected as cases, qualitative analysis revealed factors influencing implementation and fidelity were multiple, and operated independently and in combination. Factors were related to the internal hospital environment (e.g., leadership support, access to knowledge and information, perceived importance of calorie posting implementation), external hospital environment (e.g., national policy, monitoring), features of the calorie posting policy (e.g., availability of supporting materials), and the implementation process (e.g., engaging relevant stakeholders). Integrated analysis of fidelity indicated a pattern of partial adherence to the calorie posting policy across the four hospitals. Across all hospitals, there was a consistent pattern of low adherence to calorie posting across all menu items on sale, low adherence to calorie information displayed per standard portion or per meal, low adherence to standardised recipes/portions, and inaccurate calorie information. Efforts to maximise fidelity require multi-level, multi-component strategies in order to reduce or mitigate barriers and to leverage facilitators. Future research should examine the relative importance of calorie posting determinants and the association between implementation strategies and shifts in fidelity to intervention core components.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a020/8414889/af712097e730/fpubh-09-707668-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a020/8414889/af712097e730/fpubh-09-707668-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a020/8414889/af712097e730/fpubh-09-707668-g0001.jpg
摘要

菜单营养信息标签越来越成为一项重要的肥胖防控政策选择。尽管目前已有大量研究集中于确定其有效性,但鲜有研究报告菜单标签的实施程度符合设计初衷。本研究旨在探讨影响爱尔兰公立急性医院热量公示政策实施一致性的因素。采用混合方法顺序解释性研究设计,其中嵌套案例研究作为定性部分。首先分析医院实施一致性的定量数据,并在后续定性阶段进行案例抽样。最大变异抽样用于选择 4 家医院,这些医院在地理位置、医院规模、提供护理的复杂性和医院类型方面具有高低不同的实施和变化。使用结构化观察、非结构化非参与性观察和深入的半结构化访谈收集数据。实施研究综合框架指导定性数据收集和分析。使用框架分析确定影响实施的因素。使用三角协议整合来自多个来源的实施一致性发现。使用联合展示进行案例内和跨案例分析,将影响因素和实施一致性的数据结合起来。 定量实施一致性数据显示,7 家医院被归类为低实施者,28 家医院为政策的高实施者。在选定的 4 家案例医院中,定性分析显示影响实施和一致性的因素是多方面的,独立或组合运作。这些因素与医院内部环境(如领导力支持、获取知识和信息、对热量公示实施的重要性感知)、医院外部环境(如国家政策、监测)、热量公示政策特征(如支持材料的可用性)以及实施过程(如吸引相关利益相关者)有关。对一致性的综合分析表明,这 4 家医院的热量公示政策存在部分实施的模式。在所有医院中,销售的所有菜单项目的热量公示普遍较低,每份或每餐显示的热量信息与标准份量不符,标准食谱/份量的遵守程度较低,以及热量信息不准确。为了最大限度地提高一致性,需要采取多层次、多组成部分的策略,以减少或缓解障碍,并利用促进因素。未来的研究应该检查热量公示决定因素的相对重要性,以及实施策略与干预核心要素的一致性变化之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Fidelity to a Calorie Posting Policy in Public Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study.影响公立医院执行卡路里公示政策的因素:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 13;9:707668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.707668. eCollection 2021.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review.从餐饮服务行业角度看实施菜单标签干预措施的障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00948-1.
3
Implementation fidelity in a complex intervention promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.在一项复杂干预措施中促进中风后心理社会健康的实施保真度:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0694-z.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.菜单标签干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素,以支持健康食物选择:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 23;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0752-3.
5
Health and Economic Impacts of the National Menu Calorie Labeling Law in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.美国国家菜单卡路里标签法的健康与经济影响:一项微观模拟研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006313. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006313. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
Implementation fidelity of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose administration for iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy: a mixed-methods study nested in a clinical trial in Nigeria.妊娠缺铁性贫血患者静脉注射羧麦芽糖铁的实施保真度:一项嵌套于尼日利亚一项临床试验中的混合方法研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 23;5(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00609-5.
7
A quasi-experimental study of a mandatory calorie-labelling policy in restaurants: Impact on use of nutrition information among youth and young adults in Canada.餐馆实施强制性卡路里标签政策的准实验研究:对加拿大青年和年轻人营养信息使用的影响。
Prev Med. 2018 Nov;116:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of a complex quality improvement intervention for acute kidney injury: A qualitative evaluation of stakeholder perceptions of the Tackling AKI study.急性肾损伤复杂质量改进干预实施的障碍和促进因素:对 Tackling AKI 研究利益相关者认知的定性评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 20;14(9):e0222444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222444. eCollection 2019.
9
Factors influencing implementation of digital cardiac rehabilitation: A qualitative analysis of health workers perspectives.影响数字心脏康复实施的因素:对卫生工作者观点的定性分析
HRB Open Res. 2024 Jul 26;7:50. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13929.1. eCollection 2024.
10
Standardising costs or standardising care? Qualitative evaluation of the implementation and impact of a hospital funding reform in Ontario, Canada.标准化成本还是标准化护理?加拿大安大略省一项医院供资改革的实施和影响的定性评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Aug 3;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0353-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions.聚焦于保真度:健康行为改变干预试验中提高干预保真度的叙述性综述与建议
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Mar 12;8(1):132-151. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1738935.
2
Will calorie labels for food and drink served outside the home improve public health?提供非家庭自制食品和饮料的卡路里标签会改善公众健康吗?
BMJ. 2021 Jan 20;372:n40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n40.
3
Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science.
吻合分析:实施科学中因果推断的一种新方法。
Implement Sci. 2020 Dec 11;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01070-3.
4
Development and use of a toolkit to facilitate implementation of an evidence-based intervention: a descriptive case study.促进循证干预措施实施的工具包的开发与应用:一项描述性案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Oct 6;1:86. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00081-x. eCollection 2020.
5
Implementation and sustainment of diverse practices in a large integrated health system: a mixed methods study.大型综合医疗系统中多种实践的实施与维持:一项混合方法研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Jul 3;1:61. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00053-1. eCollection 2020.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions from a food service industry perspective: a mixed methods systematic review.从餐饮服务行业角度看实施菜单标签干预措施的障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00948-1.
7
Differences in energy and nutritional content of menu items served by popular UK chain restaurants with versus without voluntary menu labelling: A cross-sectional study.有与无自愿性菜单标签的英国流行连锁餐厅供应的菜单项目在能量和营养成分方面的差异:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0222773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222773. eCollection 2019.
8
A bit or a lot on the side? Observational study of the energy content of starters, sides and desserts in major UK restaurant chains.多一点还是少一点配菜?对英国主要连锁餐厅开胃菜、配菜和甜点的能量含量进行的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e029679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029679.
9
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Evidence-Based Practices for Obesity Prevention in Head Start.一项针对“学前教育中肥胖预防的循证实践障碍与促进因素的混合方法探索”
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;51(9):1067-1079.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Increasing healthy life expectancy equitably in England by 5 years by 2035: could it be achieved?到2035年在英格兰公平地将健康预期寿命提高5年:这能实现吗?
Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2571-2573. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31510-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.