Suppr超能文献

运用混合方法来衡量学术机构与社区合作开展步行干预项目时社区能力的认知情况。

Using mixed methods to measure the perception of community capacity in an academic-community partnership for a walking intervention.

作者信息

Anderson-Lewis Charkarra, Cuy-Castellanos Diana, Byrd Arnecca, Zynda Karen, Sample Alicia, Blakely Reed Vickie, Beard Mary, Minor Latessa, Yadrick Kathleen

机构信息

1University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2012 Nov;13(6):788-96. doi: 10.1177/1524839911404230. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

Abstract

H.U.B. City Steps is a 5-year community-based participatory research walking intervention designed to help lower blood pressure in a majority African American population in southern Mississippi via community collaboration and capacity building, increased walking, culturally tailored health education sessions, and motivational interviewing. Building community capacity for physical activity is a key component of this intervention. Qualitative and quantitative methods have been used to assess how project stakeholders perceive the community capacity-building efforts of the project. This article illustrates the baseline results of this mixed methods approach from the perspective of three groups of stakeholders: project researchers and staff, community advisory board, and intervention walking coaches. Eight constructs were examined, including leadership, resources, external networking, visibility and recognition, personnel sustainability, ability and commitment to organize, communication with community members, and relationships with influential others. Quantitative results indicated significant differences among stakeholder groups for project leadership and personnel sustainability. Qualitative perspectives provided an opportunity to examine possible reasons for these differences. Overall findings provide direction related to improving intervention outcomes and sustainability.

摘要

H.U.B. 城市阶梯计划是一项为期5年的基于社区参与的研究性步行干预项目,旨在通过社区合作与能力建设、增加步行量、开展符合文化特点的健康教育课程以及动机访谈,帮助密西西比州南部的大多数非裔美国人降低血压。增强社区开展体育活动的能力是该干预项目的一个关键组成部分。已运用定性和定量方法来评估项目利益相关者如何看待该项目的社区能力建设工作。本文从三组利益相关者的角度阐述了这种混合方法的基线结果:项目研究人员和工作人员、社区咨询委员会以及干预步行教练。研究了八个方面,包括领导力、资源、外部网络、知名度与认可度、人员可持续性、组织能力与承诺、与社区成员的沟通以及与有影响力的其他人的关系。定量结果表明,利益相关者群体在项目领导力和人员可持续性方面存在显著差异。定性观点提供了一个审视这些差异可能原因的机会。总体研究结果为改善干预效果和可持续性提供了方向。

相似文献

6
Evaluating a Community-Based Walking Program: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Community Capacity.
J Phys Act Health. 2024 Dec 4;22(1):78-84. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2023-0286. Print 2025 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Development of scales measuring the capacity of community-based initiatives.
Health Educ Behav. 2008 Jun;35(3):298-315. doi: 10.1177/1090198106293525. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
7
Working with Toronto neighbourhoods toward developing indicators of community capacity.
Health Promot Int. 2003 Dec;18(4):339-50. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dag415.
8
Evaluating community capacity.评估社区能力。
Health Soc Care Community. 2002 Nov;10(6):485-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00388.x.
9
Principals and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1998 Mar;4(2):37-47. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199803000-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验