School of International Service, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20016-8071, USA.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2011 Sep 27;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S6. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-14-S2-S6.
There exists no consistent explanation for why some countries are successful in combating HIV/AIDS and others are not, and we need such an explanation in order to design effective policies and programmes. Research evaluating HIV interventions from a biomedical or public health perspective does not always take full account of the historical and organizational characteristics of countries likely to influence HIV outcomes. The analysis in this paper addresses this shortcoming by testing the impact of organizational and structural factors, particularly those resulting from population interventions, on HIV outcomes at the country level in sub-Saharan Africa.
The primary independent variables are factors that originated from efforts to slow population growth: whether a country has a long-time affiliate of the International Planned Parenthood Federation and whether a country has a population policy. Additional structural factors likely to impact HIV outcomes include the level of wealth, the level of cultural fractionalization, and the former colonial power. The present study uses multivariate regression techniques with countries in sub-Saharan Africa as the unit of analysis, and four measures of success in addressing HIV: the change in prevalence between 2001 and 2009; the change in incidence between 2001 and 2009; the level of overall antiretroviral coverage in 2009; and the level of antiretroviral coverage for prevention of vertical transmission in 2009.
Countries with the greatest declines in HIV prevalence and incidence had older International Planned Parenthood Federation affiliates and had adopted population policies, even after controlling for age of epidemic, level of antiretroviral coverage, and funding for HIV. Population policies are also important predictors of levels of overall antiretroviral coverage and of coverage of HIV-positive pregnant women to prevent vertical transmission. Structural factors with significant impacts include wealth, cultural fractionalization and former colonial power.
The organizational and structural context of African countries is strongly predictive of HIV outcomes. This finding implies that policy and programmatic efforts should be put towards strengthening existing organizations and perhaps even creating new ones. The fact that cultural fractionalization also influences HIV outcomes suggests that efforts must be put towards identifying ways to reach political consensus in diverse societies.
一些国家成功控制艾滋病,而另一些国家则不然,对于这一现象,我们还没有一个统一的解释,而我们需要这样的解释来设计有效的政策和项目。从生物医学或公共卫生的角度评估艾滋病干预措施的研究,并不总是充分考虑到可能影响艾滋病结果的国家的历史和组织特征。本文通过检验组织和结构因素(特别是那些源于人口干预的因素)对撒哈拉以南非洲国家一级艾滋病结果的影响,弥补了这一不足。
主要的自变量是减缓人口增长的努力所产生的因素:一个国家是否有一个长期的国际计划生育联合会的分支机构,以及一个国家是否有一项人口政策。其他可能影响艾滋病结果的结构因素包括财富水平、文化分裂程度和前殖民大国。本研究采用多元回归技术,以撒哈拉以南非洲国家为分析单位,使用了四种衡量艾滋病应对成功的指标:2001 年至 2009 年期间流行率的变化;2001 年至 2009 年期间发病率的变化;2009 年抗逆转录病毒治疗的总体覆盖率;以及 2009 年预防母婴垂直传播的抗逆转录病毒治疗覆盖率。
艾滋病流行率和发病率下降幅度最大的国家,其国际计划生育联合会的分支机构历史更悠久,并且采取了人口政策,即使在控制了艾滋病发病年龄、抗逆转录病毒治疗覆盖率和艾滋病毒资金的情况下也是如此。人口政策也是总体抗逆转录病毒治疗覆盖率和艾滋病毒阳性孕妇预防母婴垂直传播覆盖率的重要预测因素。具有显著影响的结构因素包括财富、文化分裂和前殖民大国。
非洲国家的组织和结构背景对艾滋病结果具有很强的预测性。这一发现意味着,应该努力加强现有的组织,甚至可能创建新的组织。文化分裂也影响艾滋病结果这一事实表明,必须努力寻找在多元化社会中达成政治共识的方法。