Departamento de Psicología Experimental y Fisiología del Comportamiento, Universidad de Granada, España.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):518-28. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.588295.
Based on Posner's (1994) model of attentional functions, the relationship between age and personal proneness to attention-related errors while driving and the functioning of the 3 attentional networks were explored by means of attentional behavioral measures and self-report data.
A sample of 55 drivers was drawn from the general population of Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. The Attention Network Test for Interactions (ANTI) (Callejas et al. 2004) task was used to obtain behavioral measures of the attentional networks, and we used the Attention-Related Driving Error Scale (ARDES) (Ledesma et al. 2010) questionnaire to obtain a self-report measure of attention-related driving errors.
Drivers reporting the greatest propensity to experience attention-related errors showed an overall slowdown in performance, less endogenous preparation for high = priority warning signs, and a better response to conflict in the presence of valid cues than drivers less prone to attention-related errors while driving. Older participants showed a slowdown in performance, less endogenous preparation for high-priority warning signs, and worse cognitive control when solving conflict in comparison with younger drivers.
We suggest that each group variable, attention-related error proneness and age, shows a particular combination of attentional network functioning that implies different ways of being distracted, which have different practical implications for safe driving. It can be inferred that drivers who are more prone to commit attentional errors while driving run less risk in situations in which they can deal with response conflict in the presence of valid cues because of the particular way in which their attentional networks are combined when a valid cue is present, could serve to compensate, with a better response conflict, their general slowdown and less endogenous preparedness for high-priority signs. It can be inferred that older drivers might show a reduction of the general state of alertness to signs that indicate the presence of a dangerous driving situation and in solving conflict in traffic circumstances.
基于 Posner(1994)的注意力功能模型,通过注意力行为测量和自我报告数据,探讨年龄与驾驶时与注意力相关的个人易犯错误之间的关系,以及 3 种注意力网络的功能。
从阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯马德普拉塔的一般人群中抽取了 55 名驾驶员作为样本。使用注意力网络测试(ANTI)(Callejas 等人,2004)任务获得注意力网络的行为测量,我们使用注意力相关驾驶错误量表(ARDES)(Ledesma 等人,2010)问卷获得注意力相关驾驶错误的自我报告测量。
报告有最大注意力相关错误倾向的驾驶员表现出整体表现放缓,对高优先级警告标志的内源性准备不足,并且在存在有效提示时对冲突的反应更好,而不是较少易受注意力相关错误影响的驾驶员。与年轻驾驶员相比,年龄较大的参与者表现出性能下降,对高优先级警告标志的内源性准备不足,以及在解决冲突时的认知控制能力更差。
我们认为,每个组变量,即注意力相关的错误倾向和年龄,表现出特定的注意力网络功能组合,这意味着不同的分心方式,这对安全驾驶有不同的实际意义。可以推断,那些在驾驶时更容易犯注意力错误的驾驶员在存在有效提示时处理冲突的情况下风险较小,因为当存在有效提示时,他们的注意力网络以特定的方式组合,可能会更好地应对冲突,弥补其整体表现放缓和对高优先级标志的内源性准备不足。可以推断,年龄较大的驾驶员可能表现出对指示危险驾驶情况存在的标志的警觉状态降低,以及在交通情况下解决冲突的能力降低。