Lee Soo Jeong, Kim Ei Tae, Moon Yeon Sung
Department of Ophthalmology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;25(5):299-304. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.5.299. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography.
The present study included 90 eyes with bevacizumab injection and 38 eyes with combination treatment. Using chart records, patients were reviewed until 6 months after treatment. The present study compared changes of visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness at each follow up. DME was classified into 4 types and the morphologic pattern was compared.
In patients with the bevacizumab injection only, VA improved from 0.29 ± 0.18 to 0.48 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.32 ± 0.20 at 6 months after treatment. In the combination treatment, VA improved from 0.32 ± 0.22 to 0.52 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.36 ± 0.18 at 6 months after treatment. There was no significant improvement of VA at the final follow-up with either treatment. There was significant decrease of macular thickness except in the mixed DME type.
The combination treatment did not yield better VA or macular thickness reduction at 6 months than bevacizumab injection alone. By classifying and observing the change of DME type, determining the treatment objectively and predicting the effectiveness of treatment can be helpful.
比较玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗与联合治疗(贝伐单抗与黄斑光凝)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效。此外,使用光学相干断层扫描研究DME类型的变化。
本研究纳入90只接受贝伐单抗注射的眼和38只接受联合治疗的眼。通过病历记录对患者进行随访直至治疗后6个月。本研究比较每次随访时的视力(VA)和黄斑厚度变化。将DME分为4种类型并比较形态学模式。
仅接受贝伐单抗注射的患者,治疗后1个月时VA从0.29±0.18提高至0.48±0.26,6个月时恢复至0.32±0.20。联合治疗组,治疗后1个月时VA从0.32±0.22提高至0.52±0.26,6个月时恢复至0.36±0.18。两种治疗在最终随访时VA均无显著改善。除混合性DME类型外,黄斑厚度均显著降低。
联合治疗在6个月时的视力改善或黄斑厚度降低效果并不优于单独注射贝伐单抗。通过对DME类型进行分类和观察其变化,有助于客观地确定治疗方案并预测治疗效果。