Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Med Phys. 2011 Sep;38(9):5049-57. doi: 10.1118/1.3618730.
To assess five different methods of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurement for partially parallel imaging (PPI) acquisitions.
Measurements were performed on a spherical phantom and three volunteers using a multichannel head coil a clinical 3T MRI system to produce echo planar, fast spin echo, gradient echo, and balanced steady state free precession image acquisitions. Two different PPI acquisitions, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition algorithm and modified sensitivity encoding with acceleration factors (R) of 2-4, were evaluated and compared to nonaccelerated acquisitions. Five standard SNR measurement techniques were investigated and Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine agreement between the various SNR methods. The estimated g-factor values, associated with each method of SNR calculation and PPI reconstruction method, were also subjected to assessments that considered the effects on SNR due to reconstruction method, phase encoding direction, and R-value.
Only two SNR measurement methods produced g-factors in agreement with theoretical expectations (g ≥ 1). Bland-Altman tests demonstrated that these two methods also gave the most similar results relative to the other three measurements. R-value was the only factor of the three we considered that showed significant influence on SNR changes.
Non-signal methods used in SNR evaluation do not produce results consistent with expectations in the investigated PPI protocols. Two of the methods studied provided the most accurate and useful results. Of these two methods, it is recommended, when evaluating PPI protocols, the image subtraction method be used for SNR calculations due to its relative accuracy and ease of implementation.
评估部分并行采集(PPI)采集的五种不同信噪比(SNR)测量方法。
使用多通道头部线圈和临床 3T MRI 系统在球形体模和三名志愿者上进行测量,以产生回波平面、快速自旋回波、梯度回波和平衡稳态自由进动图像采集。评估并比较了两种不同的 PPI 采集,广义自校准部分并行采集算法和加速因子(R)为 2-4 的改进灵敏度编码。研究了五种标准 SNR 测量技术,并使用 Bland-Altman 分析确定了各种 SNR 方法之间的一致性。还对与 SNR 计算和 PPI 重建方法相关的估计 g 因子值进行了评估,考虑了重建方法、相位编码方向和 R 值对 SNR 的影响。
只有两种 SNR 测量方法产生的 g 因子与理论预期相符(g≥1)。Bland-Altman 测试表明,这两种方法与其他三种测量方法相比,结果也最相似。在我们考虑的三个因素中,R 值是唯一对 SNR 变化有显著影响的因素。
在研究的 PPI 方案中,用于 SNR 评估的非信号方法不会产生与预期一致的结果。研究的两种方法提供了最准确和有用的结果。在评估 PPI 方案时,建议使用图像减法方法进行 SNR 计算,因为该方法相对准确且易于实施。