Department of Cardiac Arrhythmia, Cardiology Division, Picardie University Hospital, Avenue René Laennec, 80054 Amiens, France.
Europace. 2012 Jun;14(6):898-902. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur319. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is recommended in patients with Brugada syndrome (BS) who experienced aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) or syncope while the risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias is a difficult step in patients with atypical symptoms. Implantable loop recorder (ILR) use has been proposed to study patients with unexplained recurrent syncopal events, but its usefulness remains to be defined in patients with BS. In this retrospective study we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ILR as a diagnostic tool in BS patients suspected of low or moderate risk of SCD.
We gathered data from 11 ILR recipients with supposed risk of ventricular arrhythmia, issue of Amiens registry of 204 patients with BS. We reported clinical events before and after implant, electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics, ILR findings, and its limitations as well as tried to specify ILR utility in diagnosis approach and its consequent contribution to guide the optimal therapy. Within the 11 patients (8 men, 3 women), 9 were symptomatic, and 5 had a spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern. During mean follow-up period of 33 months, 8 patients had a recurrence of symptoms with a mean delay of 9 months after implant. Bradycardia (two atrioventricular blocks and two sinus bradycardia) was detected in four out of eight patients (50%), and there was no ventricular arrhythmia in any patient during symptomatic events which included six vasovagal syncopes and two epileptic seizures. Two initially asymptomatic patients did not experience any symptoms after ILR implant and their ILR recordings did not reveal any arrhythmias.
The ILR contributed to the exclusion of a ventricular arrhythmia as a mechanism of an atypical syncope in patients with electrocardiographic BS and the suspension of the ICD implant. Episodes of transient symptomatic bradycardia were the most common findings suggesting the vagal mechanism of symptoms. The use of ILR should be considered in selected patients with atypical syncope and spontaneous or transient Type 1 ECG pattern.
在经历过心脏性猝死(SCD)或晕厥而中止的 Brugada 综合征(BS)患者中,推荐植入式心脏转复除颤器(ICD)治疗。在具有非典型症状的患者中,对室性心律失常的风险分层是一个困难的步骤。已经提出使用植入式环路记录器(ILR)来研究不明原因反复发作晕厥事件的患者,但在 BS 患者中的有效性仍有待确定。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在研究 ILR 作为疑似 SCD 低或中度风险的 BS 患者的诊断工具的有效性。
我们从 204 例 BS 患者的 Amiens 注册研究中收集了 11 例疑似存在室性心律失常风险和 ILR 植入问题的患者的数据。我们报告了植入前后的临床事件、心电图(ECG)特征、ILR 发现及其局限性,并试图确定 ILR 在诊断方法中的用途及其对指导最佳治疗的贡献。在 11 例患者(8 名男性,3 名女性)中,9 例有症状,5 例有自发的 1 型 ECG 模式。在平均 33 个月的随访期间,8 例患者在植入后平均 9 个月后出现症状复发。在 8 例患者中有 4 例(50%)检测到心动过缓(2 例房室传导阻滞和 2 例窦性心动过缓),在有症状的事件中没有任何患者发生室性心律失常,包括 6 例血管迷走性晕厥和 2 例癫痫发作。2 例最初无症状的患者在 ILR 植入后没有出现任何症状,他们的 ILR 记录也没有发现任何心律失常。
ILR 有助于排除心电图 BS 患者非典型晕厥的室性心律失常机制,并暂停 ICD 植入。短暂症状性心动过缓发作是最常见的提示症状的迷走神经机制的发现。在具有非典型晕厥和自发或短暂 1 型 ECG 模式的选定患者中,应考虑使用 ILR。